• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[A randomized controlled clinical trial of sulperazone as compared with cefotaxime in the treatment of bacterial infections].

作者信息

Li J, Miao J, Hu W

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Beijing Medical University.

出版信息

Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1995 Oct;34(10):680-2.

PMID:8731830
Abstract

A randomized controlled clinical trial of sulperazone as compared with cefotaxime was conducted. 207 patients with bacterial infections entered the study. The overall clinical efficacy rate of sulperazone and cefotaxime was 95.15% and 90.38% respectively. The bacterial clearance rate in the two groups was 84.7% and 80.6% respectively. The adverse drug reactions in both groups were mild with the rate of 7.77% and 8.65% respectively; there was no statistical difference between the two groups. The results of disc susceptibility test showed that the sensitive rate of the clinical isolates to sulperazone was 90.9%, being significantly higher than that of cefotaxime 69.3% (P < 0.001).

摘要

相似文献

1
[A randomized controlled clinical trial of sulperazone as compared with cefotaxime in the treatment of bacterial infections].
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1995 Oct;34(10):680-2.
2
[A randomized clinical study of sulperazone versus tienam in the treatment of LRTIS].
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1996 Dec;35(12):819-23.
3
Sulbactam/cefoperazone versus cefotaxime for the treatment of moderate-to-severe bacterial infections: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.舒巴坦/头孢哌酮与头孢噻肟治疗中重度细菌感染:一项随机对照临床试验的结果
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Mar;24(3):498-505. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.3.498.
4
[A trial of using sulperazone (cefoperazone/sulbactam) in the combined treatment of patients with a burn infection].
Antibiot Khimioter. 1995 May;40(5):38-41.
5
[Sulperazone in the treatment of severe infections in patients with cancer].舒普深用于治疗癌症患者的严重感染
Antibiot Khimioter. 2003;48(3):26-9.
6
Comparative in-vitro activity of cefoperazone-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam combinations against ESBL pathogens in respiratory and urinary infections.头孢哌酮-他唑巴坦与头孢哌酮-舒巴坦联合用药对呼吸道和泌尿系统感染中产生超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)病原体的体外活性比较
J Assoc Physicians India. 2012 Nov;60:22-4.
7
[Use of a combination of cefoperazone with sulbactam for treatment of patients with wound infections].头孢哌酮与舒巴坦联合应用治疗伤口感染患者
Antibiot Khimioter. 1994 Dec;39(12):31-4.
8
[Microorganisms isolated from urinary tract infection and their beta-lactamase production and evaluation of clinical efficacy of sulperazone].[从尿路感染中分离出的微生物及其β-内酰胺酶的产生与舒普深临床疗效评估]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988 Aug;34(8):1503-14.
9
Cost-effectiveness study comparing cefoperazone-sulbactam to a three-drug combination for treating intraabdominal infections in an Indian health-care setting.在印度医疗环境中比较头孢哌酮-舒巴坦与三联药物组合治疗腹腔内感染的成本效益研究。
Value Health. 2008 Mar;11 Suppl 1:S33-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00364.x.
10
Ampicillin/sulbactam compared with cefotaxime in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections of bacterial etiology.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢噻肟治疗细菌性病因的下呼吸道感染的比较。
Adv Ther. 1995 Jan-Feb;12(1):62-71.