Li G, Zhang Y, Wu J
Institute of Antibiotics, Shanghai Medical University.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1995 Nov;34(11):764-6.
To evaluate the efficacy and the safety of cefteram in bacterial infections, a randomized control study of cefteram and cefaclor on the treatment of 123 patients with respiratory and urinary tract infections was carried out. The result showed that the effective and bacterial eradication rates were 92.1% and 91.4% for cefteram. 83.3% and 85.2% for cefalor. Adverse reactions were mainly gastrointestinal reactions, occurring in 4.6% of the cefteram group and 9.4% of the cefaclor group. Study of minimum inhibitory concentration displayed high antibacterial activity of cefteram for enterobacteriaceae and other Gram-negative organisms and its activity was higher than that of gentamyicin and ciprofloxacin for E. coli. It is concluded that cefteram was effective and safe in the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections.
为评估头孢特仑在细菌感染中的疗效和安全性,开展了一项头孢特仑与头孢克洛治疗123例呼吸道和泌尿道感染患者的随机对照研究。结果显示,头孢特仑的有效率和细菌清除率分别为92.1%和91.4%,头孢克洛分别为83.3%和85.2%。不良反应主要为胃肠道反应,头孢特仑组发生率为4.6%,头孢克洛组为9.4%。最低抑菌浓度研究显示,头孢特仑对肠杆菌科细菌和其他革兰氏阴性菌具有较高的抗菌活性,其对大肠杆菌的活性高于庆大霉素和环丙沙星。结论是,头孢特仑治疗呼吸道和泌尿道感染有效且安全。