• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压的经济有效疗法。

Cost-effective therapy for hypertension.

作者信息

Barrie W

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Michigan School Medicine, Ann Arbor, 48105, USA.

出版信息

West J Med. 1996 Apr;164(4):303-9.

PMID:8732729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1303503/
Abstract

The costs of treating hypertension are out of control. The Joint National Committee on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure and others recommend the use of diuretics and beta-blockers as first-line agents. Newer drugs such as calcium channel blockers, alpha-blockers, and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors have improved metabolic profiles, but have not been proved in long-term, randomized, controlled trials to reduce morbidity and mortality. Our General Medicine Clinic has gradually shifted toward prescribing the newer agents. We reviewed our drug use, evaluated the literature, and made recommendations in the form of guidelines. Clinicians' concerns included quality-of-life issues, sexual dysfunction, metabolic changes--lipids, potassium, insulin resistance--and others. These concerns were addressed, and a consensus was reached. Our goal is to streamline therapy, reduce costs, and provide proven effective medication.

摘要

高血压的治疗费用已失去控制。全国高血压检测、评估与治疗联合委员会及其他机构建议将利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂作为一线用药。新型药物如钙通道阻滞剂、α受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂具有改善的代谢特征,但尚未在长期随机对照试验中被证明能降低发病率和死亡率。我们的普通内科门诊已逐渐转向开具新型药物。我们回顾了用药情况,评估了文献,并以指南的形式提出了建议。临床医生关注的问题包括生活质量问题、性功能障碍、代谢变化(血脂、钾、胰岛素抵抗等)以及其他问题。这些问题都得到了解决,并达成了共识。我们的目标是简化治疗、降低成本,并提供经证实有效的药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be7/1303503/9d4254306226/westjmed00355-0019-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be7/1303503/b9e29baeefde/westjmed00355-0018-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be7/1303503/9d4254306226/westjmed00355-0019-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be7/1303503/b9e29baeefde/westjmed00355-0018-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7be7/1303503/9d4254306226/westjmed00355-0019-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effective therapy for hypertension.高血压的经济有效疗法。
West J Med. 1996 Apr;164(4):303-9.
2
Economics of suboptimal drug use: cost-savings of using JNC-recommended medications for management of uncomplicated essential hypertension.次优药物使用的经济学:使用美国国家联合委员会(JNC)推荐药物治疗单纯性原发性高血压的成本节约
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Aug;9(8):529-36.
3
Antihypertensive drug prescription trends at the primary health care centres in Bahrain.巴林初级卫生保健中心的抗高血压药物处方趋势
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 May;10(3):219-27. doi: 10.1002/pds.578.
4
The 2000 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part one--therapy.《2000年加拿大高血压管理指南:第一部分——治疗》
Can J Cardiol. 2001 May;17(5):543-59.
5
The 2004 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part II--Therapy.2004年加拿大高血压管理指南:第二部分——治疗
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jan;20(1):41-54.
6
The need for evidence in hypertension management: historical perspective.高血压管理中对证据的需求:历史视角
Ann Saudi Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;25(5):367-74.
7
[Are the newer antihypertensive agents better and more effective than diuretics?].[新型抗高血压药物比利尿剂更好、更有效吗?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 Feb 28;121(6):701-5.
8
Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid?当前高血压治疗的推荐方案:它们仍然有效吗?
J Hypertens Suppl. 2002 Feb;20(1):S3-10.
9
The 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part II - therapy.2005年加拿大高血压教育计划关于高血压管理的建议:第二部分——治疗
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):657-72.
10
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.

本文引用的文献

1
Captopril or conventional therapy in hypertensive type II diabetics. Three-year analysis.卡托普利与传统疗法用于II型糖尿病高血压患者的三年分析
Hypertension. 1993 Jun;21(6 Pt 1):786-94. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.21.6.786.
2
Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society.原发性高血压管理指南:英国高血压学会第二工作组报告
BMJ. 1993 Apr 10;306(6883):983-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6883.983.
3
Effect of hydrochlorothiazide, enalapril, and propranolol on quality of life and cognitive and motor function in hypertensive patients.
氢氯噻嗪、依那普利和普萘洛尔对高血压患者生活质量及认知与运动功能的影响。
Clin Pharm. 1993 Apr;12(4):300-5.
4
Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.男性高血压的单药治疗。六种抗高血压药物与安慰剂的比较。退伍军人事务部抗高血压药物合作研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 1;328(13):914-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304013281303.
5
Recent evidence on drug therapy of mild to moderate hypertension and decreased risk of coronary heart disease.近期关于轻度至中度高血压药物治疗及冠心病风险降低的证据。
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Mar 8;153(5):578-81.
6
Comparative effects of different antihypertensive treatments on progression of diabetic renal disease.不同降压治疗对糖尿病肾病进展的比较效果
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Apr 26;153(8):973-80.
7
Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 5. Hypertension and diabetes.加拿大高血压协会共识会议报告:5. 高血压与糖尿病
CMAJ. 1993 Sep 15;149(6):821-6.
8
Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 1. Introduction.加拿大高血压协会共识会议报告:1. 引言。
CMAJ. 1993 Aug 1;149(3):289-93.
9
Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. Final results. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research Group.轻度高血压治疗研究。最终结果。轻度高血压治疗研究组
JAMA. 1993 Aug 11;270(6):713-24.
10
Diuretic therapy for hypertension and the risk of primary cardiac arrest.高血压的利尿治疗与原发性心脏骤停风险
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 30;330(26):1852-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406303302603.