• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响音素-字素对应学习的因素。

Factors that influence phoneme-grapheme correspondence learning.

作者信息

Mauer D M, Kamhi A G

机构信息

Department of Communication, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1996 May;29(3):259-70. doi: 10.1177/002221949602900304.

DOI:10.1177/002221949602900304
PMID:8732887
Abstract

The present study examined (a) the relative impact visual and phonetic factors have on learning phoneme-grapheme correspondences, and (b) the relationship between measures of visual and phonological processing and children's ability to learn novel phoneme-grapheme correspondence pairs. Participants were 20 children with reading disabilities (RD), 10 normally achieving children matched for mental age (MA), and 10 children matched for reading age (RA). The children ranged in age from 5 years 2 months to 9 years 3 months. All children completed a phoneme-grapheme learning task consisting of four novel correspondence pairs, a visual processing task, and five measures of phonological processing. The MA and RA groups learned the four correspondence pairs in significantly fewer trials than the RD group. The RD group had the least difficulty learning the correspondence pair with different phonemes and graphemes and the most difficulty learning the correspondence pair with similar phonemes and graphemes. Performance on the learning task was significantly correlated to performance on the visual processing task and the five measures of phonological processing. Performance on the phonological processing task of short-term memory was the best predictor of overall performance on the learning task. Although children with RD were able to learn the four novel correspondence pairs, their processing deficiencies affected how readily they learned each of the correspondence pairs.

摘要

本研究考察了

(a)视觉因素和语音因素对学习音素-字素对应关系的相对影响;(b)视觉加工和语音加工测量指标与儿童学习新的音素-字素对应关系对的能力之间的关系。参与者包括20名阅读障碍儿童(RD)、10名心理年龄匹配的正常儿童(MA)和10名阅读年龄匹配的儿童(RA)。儿童年龄范围为5岁2个月至9岁3个月。所有儿童都完成了一项音素-字素学习任务,该任务由四对新的对应关系、一项视觉加工任务和五项语音加工测量组成。MA组和RA组学习这四对对应关系所需的试验次数明显少于RD组。RD组学习具有不同音素和字素的对应关系对时困难最小,而学习具有相似音素和字素的对应关系对时困难最大。学习任务的表现与视觉加工任务及五项语音加工测量的表现显著相关。短期记忆语音加工任务的表现是学习任务总体表现的最佳预测指标。虽然患有RD的儿童能够学习这四对新的对应关系,但他们的加工缺陷影响了他们学习每对对应关系的难易程度。

相似文献

1
Factors that influence phoneme-grapheme correspondence learning.影响音素-字素对应学习的因素。
J Learn Disabil. 1996 May;29(3):259-70. doi: 10.1177/002221949602900304.
2
Computer-assisted training of phoneme-grapheme correspondence for children who are deaf and hard of hearing: effects on phonological processing skills.针对失聪及听力障碍儿童的音素-字素对应关系的计算机辅助训练:对语音处理技能的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Dec;77(12):2049-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
3
Teacher candidates' mastery of phoneme-grapheme correspondence: massed versus distributed practice in teacher education.教师候选人对音素-字素对应关系的掌握:教师教育中的集中练习与分散练习
Ann Dyslexia. 2017 Apr;67(1):26-41. doi: 10.1007/s11881-016-0126-2. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
4
Grapheme-phoneme correspondence in dyslexic and matched control readers.阅读障碍者与匹配对照组读者的字素-音素对应关系。
Br J Psychol. 1994 Feb;85 ( Pt 1):41-53. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02507.x.
5
Arabic phoneme-grapheme correspondence by non-native, deaf children with cochlear implants and normal hearing children.聋童和正常听力儿童的阿拉伯语音位-书写对应关系。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2022 Nov;23(6):347-357. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2114583. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
6
Comparing phonological skills and spelling abilities in children with reading and language impairments.比较有阅读和语言障碍儿童的语音技能与拼写能力。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2008 Jan-Feb;43(1):111-24. doi: 10.1080/13682820601178584.
7
Developmental dyslexia in Hindi readers: Is consistent sound-symbol mapping an asset in reading? Evidence from phonological and visuospatial working memory.发展性阅读障碍在印地语读者中的表现:一致性的音形对应关系是否有助于阅读?来自语音和视空间工作记忆的证据。
Dyslexia. 2019 Nov;25(4):390-410. doi: 10.1002/dys.1632. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Grapheme-Phoneme Learning in an Unknown Orthography: A Study in Typical Reading and Dyslexic Children.未知文字体系中的字素-音素学习:对正常阅读儿童和诵读困难儿童的一项研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 15;9:1393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01393. eCollection 2018.
9
The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: evidence from children learning to read German.发育性阅读障碍中的非词阅读缺陷:来自学习阅读德语儿童的证据。
J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Feb;61(1):80-90. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0004.
10
Visual and phonological processing of words: a comparison of good and poor readers.单词的视觉与语音处理:优秀阅读者与阅读能力较差者的比较
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Jun-Jul;22(6):349-55. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200605.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of reading in Urdu: does deep orthography have an impact?乌尔都语阅读的预测因素:深正字法有影响吗?
Dyslexia. 2014 May;20(2):146-66. doi: 10.1002/dys.1474. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
2
Understanding Dyslexia in Children through Human Development Theories.通过人类发展理论理解儿童诵读困难症。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2012 Aug;12(3):286-94. doi: 10.12816/0003141. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
3
Memory functioning in children with reading disabilities and/or attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a clinical investigation of their working memory and long-term memory functioning.
患有阅读障碍和/或注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童的记忆功能:对其工作记忆和长期记忆功能的临床研究
Child Neuropsychol. 2008 Nov;14(6):525-46. doi: 10.1080/09297040701821752.