Rice T, Pérusse L, Bouchard C, Rao D C
Division of Biostatistics, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Obes Res. 1996 May;4(3):253-61. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1996.tb00543.x.
The evidence for common familial factors underlying total fat mass (estimated from underwater weighing) and abdominal visceral fat (assessed from CT scan) was examined in families participating in phase 2 of the Québec Family Study (QFS) using a bivariate familial correlation model. Previous QFS investigations suggest that both genetic (major and polygenic) and familial environmental factors influence each phenotype, accounting for between 55% to 71% of the phenotypic variance in fat mass, and between 55% to 72% for abdominal visceral fat. The current study suggests that the bivariate familial effect ranges from 29% to 50%. This pattern suggests that there may be common familial determinants for abdominal visceral fat and total fat mass, as well as additional familial factors which are specific to each. The relatively high spouse cross-trait correlations usually suggest that a large percent of the bivariate familial effect may be environmental in origin. However, if mating is not random, then the spouse resemblance may reflect either genetic or environmental causes, depending on the source [i.e., through similar genes or cohabitation (environmental) effects]. Finally, there are significant sex differences in the magnitude of the familial cross-trait correlations involving parents, but not offspring, suggesting complex generation (i.e., age) and sex effects. For example, genes may turn on or off as a function of age and sex, and/or there may be an accumulation over time of effects due to the environment which may vary by sex. Whether the common familial factors are genetic (major and/or polygenic), environmental, or some combination of both, and whether the familial expression depends on sex and/or age warrants further investigation using more complex models.
在参与魁北克家庭研究(QFS)第二阶段的家庭中,使用双变量家族相关模型,研究了总脂肪量(通过水下称重估算)和腹部内脏脂肪(通过CT扫描评估)背后共同家族因素的证据。先前的QFS调查表明,遗传因素(主基因和多基因)和家族环境因素均会影响每种表型,分别占脂肪量表型变异的55%至71%,以及腹部内脏脂肪表型变异的55%至72%。当前研究表明,双变量家族效应范围为29%至50%。这种模式表明,腹部内脏脂肪和总脂肪量可能存在共同的家族决定因素,以及各自特定的其他家族因素。相对较高的配偶跨性状相关性通常表明,双变量家族效应的很大一部分可能源于环境。然而,如果交配不是随机的,那么配偶的相似性可能反映遗传或环境原因,这取决于来源[即,通过相似基因或同居(环境)效应]。最后,在涉及父母而非后代的家族跨性状相关性大小上存在显著的性别差异,这表明存在复杂的代际(即年龄)和性别效应。例如,基因可能会根据年龄和性别开启或关闭,和/或随着时间的推移,环境影响可能会积累,且这种影响可能因性别而异。共同家族因素是遗传因素(主基因和/或多基因)、环境因素还是两者的某种组合,以及家族表达是否取决于性别和/或年龄,这需要使用更复杂的模型进行进一步研究。