• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《急诊医学综述:过去与未来》

Reviews in accident and emergency medicine: the past and the future.

作者信息

Hardern R D, Hamer D W

机构信息

General Infirmary, Leeds.

出版信息

J Accid Emerg Med. 1996 May;13(3):169-72. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.3.169.

DOI:10.1136/emj.13.3.169
PMID:8733650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1342680/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether reviews published in the past 10 years are as helpful as they could be to their readers, and to explain why future reviews should meet certain methodological criteria.

METHODS

The quality of 16 reviews published in two journals dealing with accident and emergency medicine over 10 years was objectively assessed using 11 currently recommended criteria.

RESULTS

The median number of methodological criteria satisfied was two. Only five of the reviews posed a specific question or problem and then answered this with conclusions based on evidence presented.

CONCLUSIONS

If reviews are to enhance patient care, the way in which they are performed, written and used must change.

摘要

目的

确定过去10年发表的综述对读者的帮助是否达到应有的程度,并解释为何未来的综述应符合某些方法学标准。

方法

使用11条目前推荐的标准,对在两本处理急诊医学的期刊上10年间发表的16篇综述的质量进行客观评估。

结果

符合方法学标准的中位数为两条。只有5篇综述提出了具体问题,然后根据所提供的证据得出结论进行回答。

结论

如果综述要改善患者护理,那么其开展、撰写和使用的方式必须改变。

相似文献

1
Reviews in accident and emergency medicine: the past and the future.《急诊医学综述:过去与未来》
J Accid Emerg Med. 1996 May;13(3):169-72. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.3.169.
2
Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.评估急诊医学文献中系统评价的质量。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):518-26. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.115881.
3
A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals.五项主要医学期刊中叙事性和系统性综述的流行情况调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0453-y.
4
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.骨科文献中系统评价的报告和方法学质量。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 5;95(11):e771-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00597.
5
The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high-impact nursing journals: a review of the literature.发表于高影响力护理期刊的系统评价的方法学质量:文献综述
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Feb;23(3-4):315-32. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12132. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
6
Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.护理期刊发表的系统评价和荟萃分析对PRISMA声明的认可情况及质量:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 7;7(2):e013905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013905.
7
Citation characteristics of research published in Emergency Medicine versus other scientific journals.发表于《急诊医学》与其他科学期刊上的研究的引用特征。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):513-7. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.114318.
8
Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature from 1998 to 2012.1998年至2012年发表于泌尿学文献中的系统评价的方法学质量
J Urol. 2015 Nov;194(5):1374-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.085. Epub 2015 May 27.
9
Abstract-to-publication ratio for papers presented at scientific meetings: a quality marker for UK emergency medicine research.在科学会议上发表的论文摘要与发表比例:英国急诊医学研究的质量标志
Emerg Med J. 2007 Jun;24(6):425-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.046078.
10
Systematic Reviews Published in Emergency Medicine Journals Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.发表于急诊医学期刊的系统评价未常规检索临床试验注册库:一项横断面分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;66(4):424-427.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.识别评估系统评价方法学和报告质量的方法:一项描述性研究。
Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 19;6(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0507-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Violence at work.工作场所暴力
Arch Emerg Med. 1993 Jun;10(2):79-85. doi: 10.1136/emj.10.2.79.
2
Trauma, inflammatory cells and ARDS.创伤、炎症细胞与急性呼吸窘迫综合征
Arch Emerg Med. 1993 Jun;10(2):108-11. doi: 10.1136/emj.10.2.108.
3
Emergency treatment of adder bites: case reports and literature review.蝰蛇咬伤的急诊治疗:病例报告及文献综述
Arch Emerg Med. 1993 Sep;10(3):239-43. doi: 10.1136/emj.10.3.239.
4
The science of reviewing research.研究综述科学
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:125-33; discussion 133-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26342.x.
5
The role of calcium in intravenous fluid therapy.钙在静脉输液治疗中的作用。
Arch Emerg Med. 1993 Dec;10(4):265-70. doi: 10.1136/emj.10.4.265.
6
Checklists for review articles.综述文章的核对清单。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 10;309(6955):648-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6955.648.
7
Rationale for systematic reviews.系统评价的基本原理。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):597-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597.
8
Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care.医疗保健效果系统评价的报告、更新与修正
BMJ. 1994 Oct 1;309(6958):862-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6958.862.
9
Systematic reviews. Some examples.系统评价。一些示例。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 17;309(6956):719-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6956.719.
10
Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.医学文献用户指南。VI. 如何使用综述。循证医学工作组。
JAMA. 1994 Nov 2;272(17):1367-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.17.1367.