Russell J A, Brown C, Bowen T, Luider J, Ruether J D, Stewart D, Chaudhry A, Booth K, Jorgenson K, Coppes M J, Turner A R, Larratt L, Desai S, Poon M C, Klassen J
Alberta Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Canada.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 May;17(5):703-8.
Twenty-six patients with haematological malignancy received cryopreserved but otherwise unmanipulated blood cell transplants (BCT) from five- or six-antigen matched siblings in whom progenitor cells had been mobilized by G-CSF. Outcomes were compared with a historical control group of 26 BMT patients matched for age and disease status. Granulocyte counts recovered to 0.5 x 10(9)/l in a median of 16 days after BCT compared with 21.5 days after BMT (P = 0.0002). Platelet counts, unsupported for 3 days, reached 20 x 10(9)/l in a median of 14 days vs 20.5 days (P = 0.0003) after BCT compared with BMT in those patients who engrafted. In the BCT and BMT groups, respectively, the risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 37 vs 21% (P = 0.16) and of chronic GVHD at 1 year 53 vs 48% (P = 0.9). There was no significant difference in red cell transfusions but BCT patients required fewer platelet transfusions (median 3 vs 5, P = 0.015) and fewer days in hospital (20.5 vs 25, P = 0.02). These results indicate that allogeneic BCT from matched and partially mismatched family donors result in faster engraftment than BMT without a significant increase in GVHD. Allogeneic BCT may prove to be a more tolerable procedure than BMT for both donor and recipient and there are indications of improved cost-effectiveness.
26例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者接受了来自五抗原或六抗原匹配同胞的冷冻保存但未经过其他处理的血细胞移植(BCT),这些同胞的祖细胞已通过粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员。将结果与26例年龄和疾病状态匹配的骨髓移植(BMT)患者的历史对照组进行比较。BCT后粒细胞计数恢复至0.5×10⁹/L的中位时间为16天,而BMT后为21.5天(P = 0.0002)。在那些植入的患者中,BCT后血小板计数在不支持3天的情况下,中位14天达到20×10⁹/L,而BMT后为20.5天(P = 0.0003)。在BCT组和BMT组中,II-IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的风险分别为37%和21%(P = 0.16),1年时慢性GVHD的风险分别为53%和48%(P = 0.9)。红细胞输血方面无显著差异,但BCT患者需要的血小板输血较少(中位3次对5次,P = 0.015),住院天数也较少(20.5天对25天,P = 0.02)。这些结果表明,来自匹配和部分不匹配家庭供体的异基因BCT比BMT植入更快,且GVHD无显著增加。对于供体和受体而言,异基因BCT可能被证明是一种比BMT更可耐受的程序,并且有迹象表明成本效益有所提高。