Suppr超能文献

启动效应如何影响两种快速的记忆内隐测试:颜色命名与单词阅读。

How priming affects two speeded implicit tests of remembering: naming colors versus reading words.

作者信息

MacLeod C M

机构信息

Division of Life Sciences, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 1996 Mar-Jun;5(1-2):73-90. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0005.

Abstract

Three experiments investigated two timed implicit tests of memory--word reading and color naming. Using the study-test procedure, Experiments 1 and 2 showed that studied words caused reliable facilitation in word reading but no interference in color naming relative to unstudied words. Indeed, there was a small amount of facilitation in color naming as well. Experiment 3 further explored the color naming task by alternating shorter study and test intervals and adding controls trials consisting of letter strings. Although both studied and unstudied words showed interference relative to the control letter strings, the amounts of interference they showed did not differ. Overall, word reading consistently displayed facilitation whereas color naming never exhibited increased interference due to word priming. Priming appears to be process-specific: It is restricted to facilitating repetition of processing previously applied to a stimulus and does not extend to influencing performance on a different task involving the same studied materials.

摘要

三项实验研究了两种限时的内隐记忆测试——单词阅读和颜色命名。采用学习-测试程序,实验1和实验2表明,与未学习的单词相比,学习过的单词在单词阅读中会产生可靠的促进作用,但在颜色命名中不会产生干扰。事实上,在颜色命名中也有少量的促进作用。实验3通过交替使用更短的学习和测试间隔,并增加由字母串组成的控制试验,进一步探索了颜色命名任务。尽管学习过的和未学习过的单词相对于控制字母串都显示出干扰,但它们所显示的干扰量没有差异。总体而言,单词阅读始终表现出促进作用,而颜色命名从未因单词启动而表现出干扰增加。启动似乎是特定于加工过程的:它仅限于促进对先前应用于刺激的加工的重复,并不扩展到影响涉及相同学习材料的不同任务的表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验