Buchner A, Wippich W
Universität Trier, Germany.
Conscious Cogn. 1996 Mar-Jun;5(1-2):226-31. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0014.
In this article, we try to clarify some of the issues raised by S.C. Draine, A.G. Greenwald, and M.R. Banaji (1996) concerning our investigation into the gender bias in fame judgments (A. Buchner & W. Wippich, 1996). First, we did not test the general hypothesis and did draw the general conclusion that Drain et al. suggest we did. Second, we did did not reject M.R. Banaji and A.G. Greenwald's (1995) assumptions about the familiarity of male and female names in the fame judgment task, but we showed how one could have come to reject it using a widespread measurement model for the process dissociation procedure. Third, we argue that the processes which Draine et al. suggest should also be included in the measurement model we used are probably negligible, and if they are not, then the validity of the results of a number of fame judgment experiments must be called into question. In general, however, we agree with what seems to be the main message of M.R. Banaji and A.G. Greenwald's (1995) research, namely, that social categories have to be considered whenever priming is investigated within a social domain.
在本文中，我们试图澄清S.C. 德赖恩、A.G. 格林沃尔德和M.R. 巴纳吉（1996年）针对我们对名人判断中的性别偏见所做调查（A. 布赫纳和W. 维皮希，1996年）提出的一些问题。首先，我们并未检验那个一般性假设，也没有得出德赖恩等人所认为我们得出的一般性结论。其次，我们并未拒绝M.R. 巴纳吉和A.G. 格林沃尔德（1995年）关于在名人判断任务中男性和女性名字熟悉度的假设，但我们展示了如何使用一种广泛应用于过程分离程序的测量模型来否定它。第三，我们认为德赖恩等人建议应纳入我们所使用测量模型的那些过程可能微不足道，而且如果并非如此，那么一些名人判断实验结果的有效性就必须受到质疑。然而，总体而言，我们认同M.R. 巴纳吉和A.G. 格林沃尔德（1995年）研究的主要观点，即只要在社会领域内研究启动效应，就必须考虑社会类别。
