• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Content specificity and oral certification exams.

作者信息

Turnbull J, Danoff D, Norman G

机构信息

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Med Educ. 1996 Jan;30(1):56-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00718.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00718.x
PMID:8736190
Abstract

This study reports on the generalizability of different skills assessed in the oral certification examinations in Internal Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Assessments from the 1992 examination were examined prospectively to determine (i) inter-rater reliability, (ii) correlation from morning to afternoon sessions, and (iii) overall test reliability. While inter-rater reliability was acceptable and in the range reported from previous studies, the generalizability across sessions was very low, ranging from 0.30 to 0.47, presumably reflecting content specificity. As a consequence, the overall test reliability was low, ranging from 0.57 to 0.69. Collapsing the overall scores into three decision categories (pass, borderline, fail) lowered the test reliability still further. Strategies to resolve this problem are suggested.

摘要

相似文献

1
Content specificity and oral certification exams.
Med Educ. 1996 Jan;30(1):56-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00718.x.
2
Performance of the Ebel standard-setting method in spring 2019 Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada internal medicine certification examination consisted of multiple-choice questions.2019年春季加拿大皇家内科医师学会内科认证考试中埃贝尔标准设定方法的表现由多项选择题组成。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:12. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.12. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
3
Use of an oral exam in an internal medicine clerkship.在内科实习中使用口试。
Annu Conf Res Med Educ. 1977;16:141-6.
4
Predicting performance on the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada internal medicine written examination.预测加拿大皇家内科医师与外科医师学院内科笔试成绩。
CMAJ. 2001 Nov 13;165(10):1305-7.
5
Certification of specialists: survey of candidates and review of the literature.专科医生认证:候选人调查与文献综述
Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Mar 1;130(5):586-90.
6
The validity and reliability of the sixth-year internal medical examination administered at the King Abdulaziz University Medical College.阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医学院进行的六年级内科考试的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Feb 1;15:10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0295-4.
7
Reliability and validity of long case and short case in internal medicine board certification examination.内科专科医师资格考试中长病例与短病例的信度和效度
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Apr;93(4):424-8.
8
Specialty certification in North America: a comparative analysis of examination results.北美专业认证:考试结果的比较分析。
J Med Educ. 1979 Feb;54(2):69-74.
9
Reliability (generalizability) of the Maastricht Skills Test.马斯特里赫特技能测试的可靠性(可推广性)。
Res Med Educ. 1988;27:228-33.
10
Differential Weighting for Subcomponent Measures of Integrated Clinical Encounter Scores Based on the USMLE Step 2 CS Examination: Effects on Composite Score Reliability and Pass-Fail Decisions.基于美国医师执照考试第二步临床技能考试的综合临床问诊分数子成分测量的差异加权:对综合分数可靠性及通过-未通过决策的影响
Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11 Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S24-S30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001359.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Multiple Mini Interviews in medical school admissions: assessment using The Big Five Personality framework.多重迷你面试在医学院招生中的有效性:基于大五人格框架的评估
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 12;23:eAO1352. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO1352. eCollection 2025.
2
Reliability and acceptability of the multiple mini-interview for selection of residents in cardiology.用于选拔心脏病学住院医师的多重迷你面试的可靠性和可接受性。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020 Jan;8(1):25-31. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2019.83903.1116.
3
A Case for Caution: Chart-Stimulated Recall.
需谨慎对待的一个案例:图表激发式回忆
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):531-5. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00011.1.
4
Expertise in performance assessment: assessors' perspectives.绩效评估专业知识:评估者的视角。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Oct;18(4):559-71. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9392-x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.