• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间频率扫描模式反转视觉诱发电位视力与斯内伦视力对比:光学离焦的影响

Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus.

作者信息

Katsumi O, Arai M, Wajima R, Denno S, Hirose T

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachuetts 02114, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 1996 Mar;36(6):903-9. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00187-5.

DOI:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00187-5
PMID:8736223
Abstract

The effect of artificially induced image defocusing on visual acuities (VAs) measured by spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal visual evoked response (SPVER) and Snellen measurement was studied in six normal subjects. The steady-state SPVER was recorded using vertical gratings of 10 different spatial frequencies ranging from 0.52 to 30.36 c/deg. The SPVER acuity was compared with Snellen acuity (SA) measured under the same conditions of optical defocus. With moderate defocusing [< + 1.0 diopter (D), VA > 20/40], the SPVER acuities were equal to or poorer than the SAs. With more defocus (> + 1.5 D, VA < 20/70), the SPVER acuities became better than the SAs. The discrepancies between the SA and SPVER acuities may be the result of the influence of the parafoveal area on the SPVER at lower visual acuity levels.

摘要

在六名正常受试者中,研究了人工诱导图像散焦对通过空间频率扫描模式反转视觉诱发电位(SPVER)和斯内伦测量法所测得的视力(VA)的影响。使用10种不同空间频率(范围为0.52至30.36周/度)的垂直光栅记录稳态SPVER。将SPVER视力与在相同光学散焦条件下测得的斯内伦视力(SA)进行比较。在中度散焦[< + 1.0屈光度(D),视力> 20/40]时,SPVER视力等于或低于SA。在散焦程度更大(> + 1.5 D,视力< 20/70)时,SPVER视力变得优于SA。SA和SPVER视力之间的差异可能是由于在较低视力水平时旁中央凹区域对SPVER产生影响的结果。

相似文献

1
Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus.空间频率扫描模式反转视觉诱发电位视力与斯内伦视力对比:光学离焦的影响
Vision Res. 1996 Mar;36(6):903-9. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00187-5.
2
[Comparison of objective assessment using the sweep pattern visual evoked response acuity (SPVERA) and illiterate E visual acuity].[使用扫描模式视觉诱发电位视力(SPVERA)与文盲E视力进行客观评估的比较]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Oct 15;22(5):342-5.
3
Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER.使用空间频率扫描图案视觉诱发电位(PVER)对斯内伦视力和客观评估进行比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997 Jul;235(7):442-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00947064.
4
[Effects of temporal frequency on the sweep pattern visual evoked response acuity].[时间频率对扫描模式视觉诱发电位视力的影响]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Dec;25(6):409-11.
5
Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.视力的客观评估:一种用于分析扫描视觉诱发电位的改进模型。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;138(2):97-116. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09672-z. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
Comparison of preferential looking acuity and pattern reversal visual evoked response acuity in pediatric patients.儿科患者中优先注视视力与图形翻转视觉诱发电位视力的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov;235(11):684-90. doi: 10.1007/BF01880666.
7
A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity.三种基于视觉诱发电位的视力估计方法的性能比较。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;126(1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s10633-012-9359-5. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
8
Pattern reversal visual evoked response and Snellen visual acuity.图形翻转视觉诱发电位和斯内伦视力表视力
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994 May;232(5):272-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00194476.
9
Comparisons among Snellen, psychophysical, and evoked potential visual acuity determinations.
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Oct;62(10):669-79. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198510000-00002.
10
Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique.使用视觉诱发电位进行实时快速视力评估:阶梯状视觉诱发电位技术的开发与验证
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jan;49(1):438-41. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0944.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.使用视觉诱发电位评估人类视力:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;20(19):5542. doi: 10.3390/s20195542.
2
VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.视诱发电位法估计视力:系统评价。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;142(1):25-74. doi: 10.1007/s10633-020-09770-3. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.正常人类中对比敏感度与扫描视觉诱发电位(sVEP)视力估计值的比较。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;139(3):207-219. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09712-8. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
4
Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.视力的客观评估:一种用于分析扫描视觉诱发电位的改进模型。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;138(2):97-116. doi: 10.1007/s10633-019-09672-z. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.低视力中基于视觉诱发电位的视力评估。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;135(3):209-218. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9613-y. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
Similarities and differences between behavioral and electrophysiological visual acuity thresholds in healthy infants during the second half of the first year of life.出生后第一年下半年健康婴儿行为视力阈值与电生理视力阈值之间的异同。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;134(2):99-110. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9576-z. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
Comparing enfant and PowerDiva sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates.比较儿童型和PowerDiva扫频视觉诱发电位(sVEP)视力估计值。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct;129(2):105-14. doi: 10.1007/s10633-014-9457-7. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
8
Conducting shorter VEP tests to estimate visual acuity via assessment of SNR.通过评估信噪比进行更短时间的视觉诱发电位测试以估计视力。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;126(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/s10633-012-9355-9. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
9
Pattern visual evoked potentials in the assessment of objective visual acuity in amblyopic children.
Int Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;30(4):377-83. doi: 10.1007/s10792-010-9361-4. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
10
Threshold determination in sweep VEP and the effects of criterion.扫描视觉诱发电位中的阈值测定及标准的影响。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;119(2):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s10633-009-9177-6. Epub 2009 Jun 24.