van Campen C M, Visser F C, Visser C A
Department of Cardiology, Free University Hospital Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Heart J. 1996 May;17(5):699-708. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014936.
Recently, a new exercise test criterion diagnosing coronary artery disease was proposed, based on a composite of changes in Q-, R- and S-waves: the QRS score. We compared this new criterion with conventional ST-segment depression and other compositions of Q-, R- and S-wave changes in patients and normals and related the QRS score to reversible thallium-201 scintigraphic defects and ST-segment depression as markers for ischaemia. The influence of beta-blockade on the QRS score was also studied.
The study population consisted of 155 persons with 53 normals (group I) and 102 patients with documented coronary artery disease (group II). Another 20 patients (group III) with proven coronary artery disease and a positive exercise test by ST-segment criteria were studied for the influence of beta-blockade on the QRS score. A symptom-limited exercise protocol according to the modified Bruce protocol was used. For the QRS score, Q-, R- and S-wave amplitudes which could be recovered immediately were subtracted from pretest values: delta Q, delta R, delta S respectively. The score was calculated by the formula: (delta R - delta Q - delta S)AVF + (delta R - delta Q - delta S)V5.
Using a cut-off point of > 5 as normal, the QRS score resulted in a sensitivity of 88.2%, a specificity of 84.8% and a predictive accuracy of 87.1%. For ST-segment depression these values were 54.9%, 83% and 64.5% respectively (P < 0.001 compared to the QRS score). Predictive accuracies of changes in Q-, R- and S-waves in leads AVF and V5 separately, combinations of changes and combining the two leads, resulted-with the exception of solitary S-wave changes-in predictive accuracies higher than those of ST-segment depression, but all were lower than the QRS score. We found a significant correlation between the QRS score, the summed ST-segment depression (P < 0.004) and the extent of reversible thallium-201 defects (P < 0.001). Applying Bayes' theorem, the combination of an abnormal QRS score and ST-segment depression resulted in the highest post-test risk for coronary artery disease and a normal QRS score without ST-segment depression in the lowest post-test risk. The QRS score and the maximal ST-segment depression changed significantly under the influence of beta-blockade (P < 0.02 and P < 0.001 respectively).
Our data suggest that an abnormal QRS score reflects myocardial ischaemia. Furthermore, for the interpretation of the exercise test, the combined analysis of ST-segments and the QRS score is of value for the prediction of the presence or absence of coronary artery disease and its follow-up.
最近,基于Q波、R波和S波变化的综合指标——QRS评分,提出了一种诊断冠状动脉疾病的新运动试验标准。我们将这一新标准与传统的ST段压低以及患者和正常人Q波、R波和S波变化的其他组合进行了比较,并将QRS评分与可逆性铊-201闪烁扫描缺损及作为缺血标志物的ST段压低相关联。还研究了β受体阻滞剂对QRS评分的影响。
研究人群包括155人,其中53名正常人(I组)和102名有冠状动脉疾病记录的患者(II组)。另外20名经证实有冠状动脉疾病且运动试验ST段标准为阳性的患者(III组)被研究β受体阻滞剂对QRS评分的影响。采用根据改良Bruce方案的症状限制性运动方案。对于QRS评分,将运动前可立即恢复的Q波、R波和S波振幅分别从前测值中减去:分别为ΔQ、ΔR、ΔS。评分通过公式计算:(ΔR - ΔQ - ΔS)AVF + (ΔR - ΔQ - ΔS)V5。
以>5为正常临界值,QRS评分的敏感性为88.2%,特异性为84.8%,预测准确率为87.1%。对于ST段压低,这些值分别为54.9%、83%和64.5%(与QRS评分相比,P<0.001)。单独分析AVF和V5导联Q波、R波和S波变化的预测准确率、变化组合以及两个导联的联合分析,除单独S波变化外,预测准确率均高于ST段压低,但均低于QRS评分。我们发现QRS评分、ST段压低总和(P<0.004)与可逆性铊-201缺损范围(P<0.001)之间存在显著相关性。应用贝叶斯定理,异常QRS评分与ST段压低的组合导致冠状动脉疾病的试验后风险最高,而无ST段压低的正常QRS评分试验后风险最低。在β受体阻滞剂影响下,QRS评分和最大ST段压低有显著变化(分别为P<0.02和P<0.001)。
我们的数据表明,异常QRS评分反映心肌缺血。此外,对于运动试验的解读,ST段和QRS评分的联合分析对于预测冠状动脉疾病的有无及其随访具有价值。