Ambiguities and irresolvable tensions in the ADA: a reply to Loretta M. Kopelman and Anita Silvers.
作者信息
Cutter M A
机构信息
Center for the Arts and Humanities, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, USA.
出版信息
J Med Philos. 1996 Apr;21(2):225-35. doi: 10.1093/jmp/21.2.225.
PMID:8739074
Abstract
This essay comments on the articles by Loretta M. Kopelman and Anita Silvers. It extends their analyses and concludes that consistency and the total absence of conflict may be unavailable when one interprets and applies the Americans with Disabilities Act.
摘要
相似文献
1
Ambiguities and irresolvable tensions in the ADA: a reply to Loretta M. Kopelman and Anita Silvers.
J Med Philos. 1996 Apr;21(2):225-35. doi: 10.1093/jmp/21.2.225.
2
Ethical assumptions and ambiguities in the Americans With Disabilities Act.
J Med Philos. 1996 Apr;21(2):187-208. doi: 10.1093/jmp/21.2.187.
3
Rationing and the Americans with Disabilities Act.配给制与《美国残疾人法案》
JAMA. 1994 Jan 26;271(4):308-14.
4
(In) equality, (ab) normality, and the Americans With Disabilities Act.
J Med Philos. 1996 Apr;21(2):209-24.
5
The Oregon health care proposal and the Americans with Disabilities Act.俄勒冈州医疗保健提案与《美国残疾人法案》。
Harv Law Rev. 1993 Apr;106(6):1296-313.
6
Rationing through choice: a new approach to cost-effectiveness analysis in health care.通过选择进行配给：医疗保健中成本效益分析的一种新方法。
Indiana Law J. 1997 Autumn;72(4):1015-97.
7
Rationing and the Americans With Disabilities Act.配给与《美国残疾人法案》。
JAMA. 1994;271(24):1903-4.
8
9
Rejecting organs: the organ allocation process and the Americans with Disabilities Act.拒绝器官：器官分配过程与《美国残疾人法案》
Am J Law Med. 1998;24(4):481-97.
10
Empirical study of the Americans with Disabilities Act: employment issues from 1990 to 1994.《美国残疾人法案》实证研究：1990年至1994年的就业问题
Behav Sci Law. 1996 Winter;14(1):5-27. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199624)14:1<5::AID-BSL224>3.0.CO;2-6.
Zotero 插件