Bianchi Porro G, Ardizzone S, Petrillo M, Caruso I, Montrone F
Gastrointestinal Unit L. Sacco University Hospital, Milano, Italy.
Digestion. 1996;57(3):186-90. doi: 10.1159/000201336.
The potentially damaging gastric and duodenal effects of dipyrone, a nonnarcotic analgesic agent, were evaluated in three phases in comparison to placebo and paracetamol. Three groups of 12 healthy adult volunteers were treated in a double-blind study, according to a cross-over, randomization sequence, using the double-dummy technique, for two 15-day periods, with dipyrone 3 g/day and placebo (group I), dipyrone 1.5 g/day and placebo (group II), and dipyrone 1.5 g/day and paracetamol 1.5 g/day (group III). An esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed at the beginning and end of each treatment period. In the first treatment group, grade-3 and 4 mucosal lesions were found after dipyrone administration (3 g/day) in 3 of 12 (25%) subjects (multiple antral erosions, gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer, 1 case each), whereas grade-2 mucosal lesions (antral erosions) were detected in 1 of 12 cases (8%) after the corresponding placebo treatment. The difference between the two treatments, however, was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Only in the gastric ulcer case were subjective symptoms reported (feeling of hunger). At the 1.5-g/day dose (groups II and III), dipyrone produced no gastroduodenal lesions, the endoscopic results showing no appreciable difference between dipyrone and either placebo (p = 0.54) or paracetamol (p = 0.99). No subjective symptoms were reported in any of these subjects. Dipyrone, administered for 2 weeks, has effects on the gastric and duodenal mucosa comparable to those of paracetamol and placebo, though noticeable damage is detectable at a dosage of 3 g/day.
与安慰剂和对乙酰氨基酚相比,分三个阶段评估了非麻醉性镇痛药安乃近对胃和十二指肠的潜在损害作用。在一项双盲研究中,按照交叉、随机序列,采用双模拟技术,将三组12名健康成年志愿者分为两组,每组为期15天,分别给予3克/天安乃近和安慰剂(第一组)、1.5克/天安乃近和安慰剂(第二组)、1.5克/天安乃近和1.5克/天对乙酰氨基酚(第三组)。在每个治疗期开始和结束时进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查。在第一个治疗组中,12名受试者中有3名(25%)在服用安乃近(3克/天)后出现3级和4级黏膜损伤(多发胃窦糜烂、胃溃疡和十二指肠溃疡,各1例),而在相应的安慰剂治疗后,12例中有1例(8%)检测到2级黏膜损伤(胃窦糜烂)。然而,两种治疗之间的差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。仅在胃溃疡病例中报告了主观症状(饥饿感)。在1.5克/天剂量组(第二组和第三组),安乃近未产生胃十二指肠病变,内镜检查结果显示安乃近与安慰剂(p = 0.54)或对乙酰氨基酚(p = 0.99)之间无明显差异。这些受试者均未报告主观症状。安乃近服用2周后,对胃和十二指肠黏膜的影响与对乙酰氨基酚和安慰剂相当,尽管在3克/天的剂量下可检测到明显损伤。