Suppr超能文献

使用扫描激光检眼镜通过微视野检查法进行黄斑裂孔的鉴别诊断。

Differential diagnosis of macular breaks by microperimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

作者信息

Kakehashi A, Ishiko S, Konno S, Akiba J, Yoshida A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Nemuro Municipal Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1996;40(1):116-22.

PMID:8739509
Abstract

To improve the differential diagnosis of macular breaks by microperimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO), we studied 50 consecutive breaks detected by biomicroscopy and indirect ophthalmoscopy. The full-thickness macular break was easily diagnosed using only biomicroscopy and indirect ophthalmoscopy because the macular break had a cuff in 22 of the eyes. SLO microperimetry also showed an absolute scotoma within the macular break and a relative scotoma on the cuff in these 22 eyes. However, in the other 28 eyes it was impossible to distinguish between the full-thickness macular breaks and pseudo-macular breaks or lamellar macular breaks using only biomicroscopy and indirect ophthalmoscopy because of the absence of a cuff. However, SLO microperimetry differentiated full-thickness macular breaks from pseudomacular breaks or lamellar macular breaks in these 28 eyes. SLO microperimetry is indispensable for determining the prognosis of and the surgical indication requirements for idiopathic macular breaks.

摘要

为了通过使用扫描激光检眼镜(SLO)的微视野检查法改善黄斑裂孔的鉴别诊断,我们研究了通过生物显微镜检查和间接检眼镜检查发现的50例连续性裂孔。由于22只眼中的黄斑裂孔有一个边缘,仅使用生物显微镜检查和间接检眼镜检查就能轻松诊断全层黄斑裂孔。在这22只眼中,SLO微视野检查也显示黄斑裂孔内有绝对暗点,边缘有相对暗点。然而,在其他28只眼中,由于没有边缘,仅使用生物显微镜检查和间接检眼镜检查无法区分全层黄斑裂孔与假性黄斑裂孔或板层黄斑裂孔。然而,SLO微视野检查在这28只眼中区分了全层黄斑裂孔与假性黄斑裂孔或板层黄斑裂孔。SLO微视野检查对于确定特发性黄斑裂孔的预后和手术指征要求是必不可少的。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验