Suppr超能文献

三维时间飞跃磁共振血管造影和磁共振成像与传统血管造影在颈动脉夹层中的比较。

Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography in carotid artery dissections.

作者信息

Stringaris K, Liberopoulos K, Giaka E, Kokkinis K, Bastounis E, Klonaris E C, Balas P

机构信息

Athens General Hospital, Dept., of Diagnostic and Medical Imaging, Greece.

出版信息

Int Angiol. 1996 Mar;15(1):20-5.

PMID:8739532
Abstract

A retrospective analysis comparing the three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography, MR imaging and transfemoral digital substraction angiography (DSA) in cases of carotid artery dissection was made. During a 2-year period, 12 cases (11 males and 1 female), aged between 16 and 60 years, were submitted to our Hospital with the symptoms of TIA, stroke or cranial nerve palsies and the suspicion of carotid dissection. Transfemoral angiograms were done in other Institutions, while the MRI and MRA were performed in our diagnostic center. Blind interpretation of MR and angiography images was made by two independent radiologists. MR angiography in combination with MR imaging was more accurate than conventional angiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery dissection. Respective sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 100% for MRI with MRA and 91.6% and 100% for conventional angiography. From the analysis of this small series, we can conclude that MR angiography in combination with MR imaging is a reliable noninvasive method for use in diagnosis of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection.

摘要

对颈动脉夹层病例的三维时间飞跃磁共振血管造影、磁共振成像和经股动脉数字减影血管造影(DSA)进行了回顾性分析。在两年期间,12例患者(11例男性和1例女性),年龄在16至60岁之间,因短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、中风或颅神经麻痹症状以及疑似颈动脉夹层而被送至我院。经股动脉血管造影在其他机构进行,而磁共振成像(MRI)和磁共振血管造影(MRA)在我们的诊断中心进行。由两名独立的放射科医生对磁共振成像和血管造影图像进行盲法解读。磁共振血管造影结合磁共振成像在诊断颈动脉夹层方面比传统血管造影更准确。磁共振成像与磁共振血管造影的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和100%,传统血管造影的敏感性和特异性分别为91.6%和100%。通过对这个小系列的分析,我们可以得出结论,磁共振血管造影结合磁共振成像是诊断颅外颈内动脉夹层的一种可靠的非侵入性方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验