Jessen M, Ivarsson A, Malm L
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Central Hospital, Växjö, Sweden.
Rhinology. 1996 Mar;34(1):28-31.
Two methods for decongestion of the nasal mucosa were compared, a conventional nasal spray and a bellows device, the reproducibility of rhinomanometric measurements being investigated in both cases. Nasal airway resistance (NAR) was measured in 18 patients (during late autumn) before, 10 min, and 20 min after decongestion with an oxymetazoline solution from a bellows device, and the measurements were repeated one week later. About three months later (during spring) the measurements were repeated in the same 18 patients, but with a xylometazoline nasal spray being used for decongestion. With neither method were any differences in NAR found between 10 and 20 min after decongestion, or between any of the values (before or after decongestion) and the respective values obtained after one week. The NAR values of the undecongested total nose and the wider nose cavity were significantly higher during the late autumn than during the spring, as were also a few values after decongestion. We found no evidence that the bellows method is superior to the spray method in reducing NAR.
比较了两种使鼻黏膜减充血的方法,即传统鼻喷雾剂和一种风箱装置,并研究了两种情况下鼻阻力测量的可重复性。在18名患者(深秋时)使用风箱装置中的羟甲唑啉溶液进行减充血前、减充血后10分钟和20分钟时测量鼻气道阻力(NAR),并在一周后重复测量。大约三个月后(春季时),对相同的18名患者再次进行测量,但使用赛洛唑啉鼻喷雾剂进行减充血。两种方法在减充血后10分钟和20分钟之间,或在任何值(减充血前或后)与一周后获得的相应值之间,均未发现NAR有差异。未减充血时全鼻和较宽鼻腔的NAR值在深秋时显著高于春季,减充血后的一些值也是如此。我们没有发现证据表明风箱法在降低NAR方面优于喷雾法。