Krasnik A
Department of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen.
Scand J Soc Med. 1996 Mar;24(1):2-7. doi: 10.1177/140349489602400102.
A population approach and the general right to health and medical care have been important issues in the development of health policy over many centuries. However, equity is still a crucial issue in the planning and evaluation of health care. Many definitions and criteria related to equity have been formulated on the basis of conflicting theories and models. Three dimensions of fair and just resource allocation are essential when needs-based models are used: equity in access, utilization, and quality of care relative to needs. Health services research should concentrate on such outcome measures regarding equity and the effect of organizational and processual characteristics of health care systems. Prominent examples of such research efforts are presented, but, unfortunately, there are few reliable and systematic data from this kind of study. Health care researchers have a special responsibility towards the population at large to undertake qualified research on equity and to communicate the results to the general public.
人口方法以及健康和医疗保健的普遍权利在多个世纪以来一直是卫生政策发展中的重要问题。然而,公平仍然是医疗保健规划和评估中的关键问题。基于相互冲突的理论和模型,已经制定了许多与公平相关的定义和标准。在使用基于需求的模型时,公平公正的资源分配的三个维度至关重要:相对于需求的医疗服务可及性、利用情况和质量方面的公平性。卫生服务研究应专注于此类关于公平以及医疗保健系统组织和过程特征影响的结果指标。文中给出了此类研究努力的突出例子,但遗憾的是,这类研究几乎没有可靠且系统的数据。医疗保健研究人员对广大民众负有特殊责任,要开展关于公平的高质量研究并将结果传达给公众。