Jacobsen T N
Department of Cardiology, Gentofte Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Dan Med Bull. 1996 Apr;43(2):126-40.
Animal studies have firmly demonstrated the importance of cardiac mechanosensitive- and chemosensitive afferents in the sympathetic reflex regulation of the peripheral circulation. However, the precise role played by these afferents in the reflex control of the cardiovascular system in conscious humans is controversial. The main focus of this work is to test the role played by these afferents in humans. An unequivocal, simple answer cannot be given, but several important conclusions can be drawn. During orthostatic stress, it seems that the baroreflexes regulate not only vascular resistance but also capillary filtration. Mild orthostatic stress caused reflex increases in sympathetic vasomotor tone in both skeletal muscle and subcutaneous tissue in both arm and leg, which indicates that the cardiopulmonary mechanoreceptors do play some role in autonomic adjustments to orthostatic stress. On the other hand, the central pieces of evidence linking the reflex response to orthostatic stress only to ventricular mechanoreceptor deactivation are negated; the orthostatically-induced increase in sympathetic vasomotor tone is not attenuated by ventricular deafferentation. Normal orthostatic-induced increase in sympathetic nerve activity appears to be dependent mainly on the sino-aortic baroreceptors. But the ventricular mechanoreceptors may play a role, because orthostatic stress causes a larger than normal fall in arterial pressure in heart transplant recipients. The role played by chemically sensitive ventricular afferents also seems to be less important than previously thought, because stimulation of these afferents elicits only localised vasodilation (the forearm) and does not produce hypotension. Ventricular afferents are thus unlikely to be as important in humans as in animals. Nonetheless, that ventricular afferents, in certain special settings, are able to induce e.g. generalised vasodilation and hypotension cannot be excluded.
动物研究已确凿证明心脏机械敏感和化学敏感传入神经在交感神经对外周循环的反射调节中的重要性。然而,这些传入神经在清醒人类心血管系统反射控制中所起的确切作用存在争议。这项工作的主要重点是测试这些传入神经在人类中的作用。虽然无法给出明确、简单的答案,但可以得出几个重要结论。在体位性应激期间,压力感受器反射似乎不仅调节血管阻力,还调节毛细血管滤过。轻度体位性应激会导致手臂和腿部骨骼肌及皮下组织的交感血管运动张力反射性增加,这表明心肺机械感受器在对体位性应激的自主调节中确实发挥了一定作用。另一方面,将对体位性应激的反射反应仅与心室机械感受器失活联系起来的核心证据被否定了;体位性诱发的交感血管运动张力增加不会因心室传入神经切断而减弱。正常体位性诱发的交感神经活动增加似乎主要依赖于窦主动脉压力感受器。但心室机械感受器可能也发挥了作用,因为体位性应激会使心脏移植受者的动脉压下降幅度大于正常情况。化学敏感的心室传入神经所起的作用似乎也比以前认为的要小,因为刺激这些传入神经仅引起局部血管舒张(前臂),并不会导致低血压。因此,心室传入神经在人类中的重要性可能不如在动物中。尽管如此,在某些特殊情况下,心室传入神经能够诱发例如全身性血管舒张和低血压这一点也不能排除。