Suppr超能文献

血清茶碱浓度治疗范围在支气管哮喘发作治疗中的意义

Significance of the therapeutic range of serum theophylline concentration in the treatment of an attack of bronchial asthma.

作者信息

Nakahara Y, Murata M, Suzuki T, Ohtsu F, Nagasawa K

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Biol Pharm Bull. 1996 May;19(5):710-5. doi: 10.1248/bpb.19.710.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the recommended theophylline therapeutic range in the treatment of acute airway obstruction. Twenty seven patients (20 to 64 years) with acute asthma attack were given aminophylline intravenously to obtain a theophylline concentration between 10 and 20 micrograms/ml. Peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) and serum theophylline concentrations were measured before and after aminophylline injection. When a marked improvement was not seen after aminophylline injection, the treatment was followed by inhalation of a beta-agonist and intravenously administered hydrocortisone. In order to clarify the relationship between theophylline efficacy at a therapeutic level and PEFR, as measured before aminophylline administration, the patients were classified into four groups. Group A (n = 7): asthma attack persisted regardless of treatment with aminophylline, beta-agonist and hydrocortisone, group B (n = 7): asthma attack improved by aminophylline, beta-agonist and hydrocortisone, group C (n = 6): asthma attack improved by both aminophylline and beta-agonist, group D (n = 7): asthma attack improved by intravenous aminophylline alone. The means (+/- S.E.) PEFR before aminophylline administration were 94.3 +/- 11.31/min in group A, 114.3 +/- 10.01/min in group B, 196.7 +/- 22.21/min in group C, and 220.0 +/- 12.51/min in group D, respectively. There were significant differences in PEFR between the A and C, A and D, B and C, and B and D groups. These findings suggest that theophylline efficacy is not expected in patients with low PEFR (less than 2001/min) at the time of treatment of an attack, even if a therapeutic theophylline concentration was obtained.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估推荐的茶碱治疗范围在治疗急性气道阻塞中的准确性。27例(20至64岁)急性哮喘发作患者静脉给予氨茶碱,使茶碱浓度达到10至20微克/毫升。在注射氨茶碱前后测量呼气峰值流速(PEFR)和血清茶碱浓度。若注射氨茶碱后未见明显改善,则继以吸入β-激动剂并静脉给予氢化可的松。为了阐明治疗水平的茶碱疗效与氨茶碱给药前测量的PEFR之间的关系,将患者分为四组。A组(n = 7):无论使用氨茶碱、β-激动剂和氢化可的松治疗,哮喘发作均持续;B组(n = 7):哮喘发作经氨茶碱、β-激动剂和氢化可的松治疗后改善;C组(n = 6):哮喘发作经氨茶碱和β-激动剂治疗后改善;D组(n = 7):哮喘发作仅经静脉注射氨茶碱改善。氨茶碱给药前,A组、B组、C组和D组的平均(±标准误)PEFR分别为94.3±11.3升/分钟、114.3±10.0升/分钟、196.7±22.2升/分钟和220.0±12.5升/分钟。A组与C组、A组与D组、B组与C组以及B组与D组之间的PEFR存在显著差异。这些发现表明,在发作治疗时,即使获得了治疗性茶碱浓度,对于PEFR较低(低于200升/分钟)的患者,茶碱疗效也不佳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验