• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五种粘结系统的临床评估:三年结果

Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems: three-year results.

作者信息

Tyas M J

机构信息

University of Melbourne, School of Dental Science, Australia.

出版信息

Int Dent J. 1996 Feb;46(1):10-4.

PMID:8744912
Abstract

Five dentine adhesive systems (four resin-based dentine bonding agents and one polyacid-modified composite resin) were evaluated clinically in non-undercut Class V 'abrasion' lesions. The loss rate of restorations varied from 26 per cent to 95 per cent at three years among the five systems. Products which bonded to dentine via the hybrid layer were markedly more retentive than those which were designed to bond chemically. The two products which attempted to achieve bonding between their carboxyl groups and dentinal calcium were hydrophilic, which probably contributed to their lack of success.

摘要

对五种牙本质粘结系统(四种树脂基牙本质粘结剂和一种聚酸改性复合树脂)进行了临床评估,用于非倒凹的V类“磨损”病变。在这五种系统中,修复体在三年时的脱落率从26%到95%不等。通过混合层与牙本质粘结的产品明显比那些设计为化学粘结的产品更具固位力。两种试图通过其羧基与牙本质钙实现粘结的产品具有亲水性,这可能是它们不成功的原因。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems: three-year results.五种粘结系统的临床评估:三年结果
Int Dent J. 1996 Feb;46(1):10-4.
2
Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.四种聚酸改性树脂复合材料和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀用于Ⅴ类洞修复的两年临床评估
Quintessence Int. 2002 Jul-Aug;33(7):542-8.
3
Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.酸蚀冲洗粘结剂、自酸蚀粘结剂及树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀在非龋性颈部病变中的长期牙本质粘结性能
Dent Mater. 2008 Jul;24(7):915-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
4
Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results.两种牙本质黏结剂的临床性能:2年随访结果
Aust Dent J. 1996 Oct;41(5):324-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1996.tb03141.x.
5
Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesives: in vitro study of a new adhesive system.光固化树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀与复合树脂粘结剂的对比评估:一种新型粘结系统的体外研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Mar;119(3):256-62. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.111552.
6
Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.Clearfil SE 和 Clearfil S3 修复未磨损的非龋性 V 类缺损 2 年临床效果评价。
Oper Dent. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):273-8. doi: 10.2341/09-266-C.
7
Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention.无机械固位的V类复合树脂修复体的临床成功率
J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 May;129(5):593-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0277.
8
Clinical performance of dentine bonding agents in the enamel-etched Class V abrasion lesion.
Aust Dent J. 1990 Oct;35(5):459-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1990.tb05430.x.
9
Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.流动复合树脂衬层和玻璃离子体衬层对采用不同粘结策略的直接复合树脂修复体Ⅱ类牙龈边缘适应性的影响。
J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):619-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
10
Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems.五种粘结系统的临床评估
Am J Dent. 1994 Apr;7(2):77-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Retention of tooth-colored restorations in non-carious cervical lesions--a systematic review.非龋性颈部病变中牙齿颜色修复体的保留——一项系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(5):1369-81. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1220-7. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
2
Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems.人源和牛源底物对两种粘结系统微渗漏的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Mar-Apr;17(2):92-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000200004.
3
What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.哪种补牙材料?牙齿修复的最佳实践。
Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):202-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.202.