Abdennader S, Casin I, Janier M, Zavaro A, Vendeuil M O, Traoré F, Morel P
Centre Clinique et Biologique des MST, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris.
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1995;122(9):580-4.
The aim of this study was: 1) to evaluate the rate of micro-organism isolation in 100 patients consulting for balanitis at the Centre of sexually transmitted diseases at the St. Louis Hospital in Paris in comparison with that of micro-organisms isolated in 60 men without balanitis; 2) to search for a possible correlation between the clinical aspect of the disease and the nature of the infectious agent identified.
One hundred consecutive patients were included in the study. All underwent a clinical examination and samples were taken for bacteriology, mycology and virology examinations. Sixty healthy volunteers served as controls. Two samples were taken from the balanopreputial groove in search for fungi and bacteria.
Candida albicans (CA) was isolated in 33 p. 100 of the patients. A pathogenic bacteria (beta-haemolytic streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella), or a potentially pathogenic germ (Haemophilus parainfluenzae, anaerobic bacteria, Gardnerella vaginalis, Streptococcus milleri, group HB5) was found without CA in 28 p. 100 of the cases, a commensal flora (enterobacteria, group D streptococci) was found without CA in 8 p. 100 and in 31 p. 100 of the cases non causal agent could be identified.
This series confirms the non-pathogenic nature of commensal bacteria: the number of isolations was similar in the subjects with and without balanitis (p < 0.9). The role played by the other bacteria in the development of balanitis is discussed: saprophytic association or direct pathogenesis? The significant difference in the rate of bacteria isolations in patients with balanitis compared with controls (p < 0.001) is in favour of a pathogenic role. The clinical presentation was not predictive of the presence of any particular micro-organism excepting the presence of pustules which were highly suggestive of candidiasis.
本研究的目的是:1)评估在巴黎圣路易医院性传播疾病中心因龟头炎就诊的100例患者中微生物分离率,并与60例无龟头炎男性的微生物分离率进行比较;2)探寻疾病的临床症状与所鉴定出的感染病原体性质之间可能存在的相关性。
连续纳入100例患者进行研究。所有患者均接受临床检查,并采集样本进行细菌学、真菌学和病毒学检查。60名健康志愿者作为对照。从包皮龟头沟采集两份样本以查找真菌和细菌。
100例患者中有33例分离出白色念珠菌(CA)。在100例病例中有28例未分离出CA,但发现了病原菌(β溶血性链球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、克雷伯菌)或潜在病原菌(副流感嗜血杆菌、厌氧菌、阴道加德纳菌、米勒链球菌、HB5组),在100例病例中有8例未分离出CA,但发现了共生菌群(肠杆菌、D组链球菌),在100例病例中有31例未能鉴定出致病因子。
该系列研究证实了共生细菌的非致病性:有龟头炎和无龟头炎的受试者中分离出的共生细菌数量相似(p < 0.9)。讨论了其他细菌在龟头炎发病过程中所起的作用:腐生关联还是直接致病?龟头炎患者与对照组相比,细菌分离率存在显著差异(p < 0.001),这支持了其致病作用。除了脓疱高度提示念珠菌病外,临床表现并不能预测任何特定微生物的存在。