Trimpeneers L M, Verbeeck R M, Dermaut L R, Moors M G
Department of Orthodontics, University of Gent, Gent, Belgium.
Eur J Orthod. 1996 Feb;18(1):89-95. doi: 10.1093/ejo/18.1.89.
The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro bond strength, to bovine enamel measured in shear, of the orthodontic adhesives Lee Insta-bond (LiB), Rely-a-Bond (RaB), Right-on (Ro), Concise precoating method (Cc), Concise mixed method (CaB), Super-C (Sc), and Orthon (Or), and of the glass ionomer cement Ketac-Cem (KC). The fracture surfaces after debonding were also examined in order to determine the sites of failure. The results indicate that there is a significant difference between the shear bond strength obtained with the different adhesives so that the mean shear bond strength decreases in the order [Ro approximately Cab approximately Sc] > [LiB approximately RaB approximately Cc] > Or > KC. Moreover, for Cab and Sc it was found that the shear bond strength varies depending on the location on the bovine tooth. The failure site was essentially at the resin-bracket interface, except for Concise, where only 50 per cent of the cases failed at the resin-bracket interface.
本研究的目的是比较正畸粘合剂Lee Insta-bond(LiB)、Rely-a-Bond(RaB)、Right-on(Ro)、Concise预涂法(Cc)、Concise混合法(CaB)、Super-C(Sc)和Orthon(Or),以及玻璃离子水门汀Ketac-Cem(KC)与牛牙釉质之间的体外剪切粘结强度。脱粘后的断裂表面也进行了检查,以确定失效部位。结果表明,不同粘合剂获得的剪切粘结强度之间存在显著差异,平均剪切粘结强度按[Ro约Cab约Sc]>[LiB约RaB约Cc]>Or>KC的顺序降低。此外,对于Cab和Sc,发现剪切粘结强度因牛牙位置而异。除了Concise,失效部位主要在树脂-托槽界面,在Concise中只有50%的病例在树脂-托槽界面失效。