• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喷砂处理对使用玻璃离子水门汀粘贴的金属托槽固位的作用。

The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement.

作者信息

Millett D, McCabe J F, Gordon P H

机构信息

Department of Child Dental Health, Dental School, Newcastle upon Tyne.

出版信息

Br J Orthod. 1993 May;20(2):117-22. doi: 10.1179/bjo.20.2.117.

DOI:10.1179/bjo.20.2.117
PMID:8518265
Abstract

A laboratory investigation of the shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets applied with glass ionomer cement (Ketac-Cem) and a conventional adhesive (Right-on) is described. Sandblasting of the bracket base was undertaken in half of the sample bonded with Ketac-Cem and produced a significant reduction in the probability of failure relative to the unsandblasted sample. Brackets with sandblasted and unsandblasted bases, bonded with Ketac-Cem were subjected to mechanical fatigue in a ball mill for a total of 20 hours. Mean survival time (MST) was then calculated for each group and was found to be significantly improved by sandblasting of the bracket base (P < 0.01).

摘要

本文描述了一项关于使用玻璃离子水门汀(Ketac-Cem)和传统粘合剂(Right-on)粘贴不锈钢托槽的剪切粘结强度的实验室研究。在使用Ketac-Cem粘贴的一半样本中,对托槽底部进行了喷砂处理,与未喷砂处理的样本相比,失败概率显著降低。使用Ketac-Cem粘贴的喷砂和未喷砂托槽在球磨机中进行了总共20小时的机械疲劳试验。然后计算每组的平均存活时间(MST),发现托槽底部喷砂处理后平均存活时间显著提高(P < 0.01)。

相似文献

1
The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement.喷砂处理对使用玻璃离子水门汀粘贴的金属托槽固位的作用。
Br J Orthod. 1993 May;20(2):117-22. doi: 10.1179/bjo.20.2.117.
2
Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.用于正畸粘结的一种复合体和一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的实验室评估。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Feb;69(1):58-63; discussion 64. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0058:LEOACA>2.3.CO;2.
3
An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
Eur J Orthod. 1996 Apr;18(2):199-204. doi: 10.1093/ejo/18.2.199.
4
Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.正畸托槽直接粘结中玻璃离子水门汀的拉伸粘结力:一项体外对比研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Oct;100(4):357-61. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70074-7.
5
In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin-glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets.用于粘结正畸托槽的三种树脂玻璃离子水门汀24小时和30天剪切粘结强度的体外研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jun;113(6):620-4. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70221-5.
6
Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.用于带环粘结的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、改良型复合树脂或传统玻璃离子水门汀?——一项体外评估
Eur J Orthod. 2003 Dec;25(6):609-14. doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.6.609.
7
Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.两种传统树脂黏合剂与一种树脂增强型玻璃离子水门汀之间托槽脱黏力的比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):463-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0463:COBDFB>2.3.CO;2.
8
The ball mill as a means of investigating the mechanical failure of dental materials.球磨机作为一种研究牙科材料机械失效的手段。
J Dent. 1996 Jan-Mar;24(1-2):117-24. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(95)00035-6.
9
Evaluation of the bond strength of different bracket-bonding systems to bovine enamel.不同托槽粘结系统与牛牙釉质粘结强度的评估。
Eur J Orthod. 1997 Jun;19(3):259-70. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.259.
10
A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sandblasting or acid etching prior to bracket bonding.一项关于在粘接托槽前通过喷砂或酸蚀进行牙釉质预备的实验室研究。
Br J Orthod. 1999 Jun;26(2):141-6. doi: 10.1093/ortho/26.2.141.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative bond failure rate of orthodontic brackets when bracket base is treated with micro-abrasive blasting . acid etching: eighteen month randomized control trial and scanning electron microscope study.正畸托槽基底经微喷砂酸蚀处理后的比较 bond 失败率:十八月随机对照试验和扫描电镜研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Jun 28;12:e17645. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17645. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of the Enamel Surface Roughness from Different Polishing Methods: Scanning Electron Microscopy and Atomic Force Microscopy Investigation.不同抛光方法下牙釉质表面粗糙度的比较:扫描电子显微镜和原子力显微镜研究
Eur J Dent. 2020 Mar;14(2):299-305. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709945. Epub 2020 May 11.
3
Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal.
使用四种不同的胶粘剂去除方法对重新粘结的陶瓷托槽进行剪切粘结强度测试。
J Dent (Tehran). 2018 Jan;15(1):54-62.
4
SBS vs Inhouse Recycling Methods-An Invitro Evaluation.SBS与内部回收方法的体外评估
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Sep;9(9):ZC04-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13865.6432. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
5
Effect of multiple debonding sequences on shear bond strength of new stainless steel brackets.多种脱粘顺序对新型不锈钢托槽剪切粘结强度的影响
J Orthod Sci. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):37-41. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.156027.
6
Comparison of shear bond strength of brackets recycled using micro sandblasting and industrial methods.使用微喷砂和工业方法回收的托槽剪切粘结强度的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):461-7. doi: 10.2319/032414-221.1. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
7
A comparative evaluation of the retention of metallic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement under different enamel preparations: A pilot study.不同釉质处理下用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的金属托槽保留情况的比较评估:一项初步研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Apr;4(2):140-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.114842.
8
Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment.喷砂处理改善托槽与牙齿的黏附。
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Feb;23(2):605-11. doi: 10.1007/s10856-011-4509-y. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
9
Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er,Cr:YSGG laser.Er,Cr:YSGG 激光去除粘结剂后再粘结托槽的抗剪粘结强度。
Odontology. 2011 Jul;99(2):129-34. doi: 10.1007/s10266-011-0012-7. Epub 2011 May 7.
10
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel under different surface treatment conditions.不同表面处理条件下正畸托槽与牙釉质的剪切粘结强度。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Apr;15(2):127-30. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000200010.