Teo P M, Leung T W, Chan A T, Yu P, Lee W Y, Leung S F, Kwan W H, Johnson P
Clinical Oncology Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong.
Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1995 Nov;31B(6):373-9. doi: 10.1016/0964-1955(95)00026-7.
A retrospective study on 422 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with cervical nodal metastases treated between 1984 and 1987 was performed. 169 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHEMO) with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil for two or three courses prior to definitive radiotherapy and 253 were treated by radical radiotherapy alone (NCHEMO). While the primary tumour (T-stage) prognosticators had been comparable between the two groups, CHEMO had significantly more advanced cervical nodal metastases with bulkier nodes and more low-cervical and supraclavicular nodes (P < 0.05) which could account for its overall worse survival, poorer regional tumour control and a trend towards worse systemic tumour control. The worse regional control in CHEMO for Ho's N1 could be the result of more bulky nodes and more tumours infiltrating the skull base and/or causing cranial nerve(s) palsy. There was no statistical or apparent difference between CHEMO and NCHEMO for the same Ho's overall stages of NPC with comparable nodal and primary tumour characteristics for the clinical endpoints of actuarial survival rate (ASR), disease-free survival rate (DFS), free of local failure survival rate (FLF), and free from distant metastases survival rate (FDM), despite the presence of significantly more fixed nodes and bulky nodes. This suggests a possible beneficial effect of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, multivariate analysis has not shown the administration of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be of prognostic significance. Even though the chemotherapy was well tolerated with little toxicity, we recommend against the routine use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical-node-positive NPC outside the context of a prospective randomised clinical trial.
对1984年至1987年间接受治疗的422例伴有颈部淋巴结转移的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者进行了一项回顾性研究。169例患者在确定性放疗前接受了两到三个疗程的顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶新辅助化疗(CHEMO),253例仅接受了根治性放疗(NCHEMO)。虽然两组之间的原发肿瘤(T分期)预后因素相当,但CHEMO组的颈部淋巴结转移明显更严重,淋巴结更大,颈下部和锁骨上淋巴结更多(P<0.05),这可以解释其总体生存率更差、区域肿瘤控制更差以及全身肿瘤控制有变差的趋势。CHEMO组中Ho分期为N1的区域控制较差可能是由于淋巴结更大以及更多肿瘤浸润颅底和/或导致颅神经麻痹。对于具有可比淋巴结和原发肿瘤特征的相同Ho分期的NPC患者,在精算生存率(ASR)、无病生存率(DFS)、无局部失败生存率(FLF)和无远处转移生存率(FDM)等临床终点方面,CHEMO组和NCHEMO组之间没有统计学或明显差异,尽管CHEMO组有明显更多的固定淋巴结和肿大淋巴结。这表明新辅助化疗可能有有益效果。然而,多变量分析并未显示新辅助化疗的实施具有预后意义。尽管化疗耐受性良好且毒性较小,但我们建议在非前瞻性随机临床试验的情况下,不常规使用新辅助化疗治疗颈部淋巴结阳性的NPC。