Dhingra K
Department of Breast and Gynecologic Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1995;23:19-24. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240590904.
Surrogate biomarkers for risk assessment and efficacy of potential chemopreventive agents are needed to improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of conducting chemoprevention trials. In addition to criteria of sensitivity, specificity, quantifiability, and reproducibility applicable to most potential biomarkers, there are additional specific constraints in developing biomarkers for specific organ sites. In the case of breast tissue, these difficulties include lack of a consensus on the nature of premalignant lesions and the histologic criteria used to define them; even when such a consensus can be evolved, there are limitations in visualizing such lesions without invasive biopsies. Also, knowledge of specific genetic and biochemical changes in premalignant lesions is limited. In addition, the physiology of breast tissue is cyclic, no proven, relevant markers can be studied in a randomly obtained needle aspirate. The earliest determinate lesion that can be recognized in breast tissue is ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). At the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, we have initiated a study to develop biomarkers for tamoxifen and 4-hydroxyphenylretinamide by administering one or both of these drugs to women with DCIS or small invasive lesions in the interval between the initial diagnostic core biopsy and definitive surgery. The treatment is to be administered for 2-4 weeks. Proposed biomarkers to be studied include: (a) markers associated with neoplastic phenotypes, e.g., excessive proliferation, alternations of nuclear morphology and angiogenesis; (b) proteins likely to be required for response to the putative chemopreventive agents, e.g., estrogen receptor, nuclear retinoid receptors; (c) markers indicative of intact downstream response pathways, e.g., progesterone receptors; (d) oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes regulated by the proposed chemopreventive agents, e.g., neu, TGF-beta; and (e) potential novel markers of genetic instability that could be studied in randomly obtained needle aspirates, i.e., random chromosomal gains and losses in high risk mammary epithelium. The experience gained in designing and conducting this trial is expected to facilitate development of future chemoprevention trials of breast, as well as other organ site cancers.
为提高化学预防试验的效率并降低成本,需要用于风险评估及潜在化学预防药物疗效的替代生物标志物。除了适用于大多数潜在生物标志物的敏感性、特异性、可量化性和可重复性标准外,针对特定器官部位开发生物标志物还有其他特定限制。就乳腺组织而言,这些困难包括对癌前病变的性质以及用于定义它们的组织学标准缺乏共识;即使能够达成这样的共识,在不进行侵入性活检的情况下可视化此类病变也存在局限性。此外,关于癌前病变中特定基因和生化变化的知识有限。另外,乳腺组织的生理是周期性的,无法在随机获取的针吸样本中研究已证实的相关标志物。乳腺组织中最早可识别的确定性病变是原位导管癌(DCIS)。在德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心,我们已启动一项研究,通过在患有DCIS或初始诊断性核心活检与确定性手术之间的间期患有小浸润性病变的女性中给予他莫昔芬和4-羟基苯基视黄酰胺中的一种或两种来开发生物标志物。治疗将持续2 - 4周。拟研究的生物标志物包括:(a)与肿瘤表型相关的标志物,例如过度增殖、核形态改变和血管生成;(b)对假定的化学预防药物反应可能所需的蛋白质,例如雌激素受体、核类视黄醇受体;(c)指示完整下游反应途径的标志物,例如孕激素受体;(d)由拟议的化学预防药物调节的癌基因和肿瘤抑制基因,例如neu、TGF-β;以及(e)可在随机获取的针吸样本中研究的潜在新型遗传不稳定性标志物,即高危乳腺上皮中的随机染色体增减。预计在设计和开展该试验中获得的经验将有助于乳腺以及其他器官部位癌症未来化学预防试验的开展。