Miller M A, Thibert L, Desjardins F, Siddiqi S H, Dascal A
McGill University, SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jan;34(1):84-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.1.84-86.1996.
We have previously found that approximately 3.5% of 428 clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis yield uninterpretable results in the BACTEC pyrazinamide (PZA) susceptibility test system, because of inadequate growth. We tested the hypothesis that polyoxyethylene stearate (POES), the ingredient of the reconstituting fluid for the test, was the cause of this growth inhibition. A total of 15 isolates known for their previously uninterpretable results and 100 randomly chosen clinical isolates were tested in parallel both with and without POES. Repeat testing of the isolates with previously uninterpretable results yielded results in the presence of POES in only seven (47%). In the absence of POES, all gave interpretable results but one such result showed false resistance. For the other 100 clinical isolates, interpretable results were obtained with and without POES, but growth was enhanced in the absence of POES, especially in the PZA-susceptible strains. This was evidenced by a decreased time to attain a growth index of 200 in the control vial (4.9 days without POES versus 5.8 days with POES; P < 0.001) and a higher mean growth index ratio on the day of interpretation of the test (7.4% without POES versus 2.2% with POES; P < 0.001). However, the enhanced growth without POES led to 20 susceptible strains being misinterpreted as either resistant or borderline. We suggest that isolates of M. tuberculosis which yield uninterpretable results in the BACTEC PZA test system should be retested both with and without POES. If interpretable results indicating PZA resistance are obtained only in the absence of POES, the result should be confirmed by a pyrazinamidase assay or by the conventional proportion method. Routine omission of POES from the BACTEC test for all clinical strains is discouraged because of the unacceptably high false-resistance rates.
我们之前发现,在428株结核分枝杆菌临床分离株中,约3.5%的菌株在BACTEC吡嗪酰胺(PZA)药敏试验系统中因生长不足而产生无法判读的结果。我们检验了这样一个假设:该试验复溶液的成分聚氧乙烯硬脂酸酯(POES)是造成这种生长抑制的原因。对15株之前结果无法判读的已知分离株和100株随机选择的临床分离株同时进行了有POES和无POES的平行测试。对之前结果无法判读的分离株进行重复测试时,只有7株(47%)在有POES的情况下得出了结果。在没有POES的情况下,所有菌株都给出了可判读的结果,但有一个这样的结果显示为假耐药。对于另外100株临床分离株,有POES和无POES时均获得了可判读的结果,但在没有POES的情况下生长得到增强,尤其是在PZA敏感菌株中。这一点可通过对照小瓶达到生长指数200的时间缩短(无POES时为4.9天,有POES时为5.8天;P<0.001)以及测试判读当天更高的平均生长指数比(无POES时为7.4%,有POES时为2.2%;P<0.001)得到证明。然而,无POES时生长增强导致20株敏感菌株被误判为耐药或临界耐药。我们建议,在BACTEC PZA试验系统中结果无法判读的结核分枝杆菌分离株应同时进行有POES和无POES的重新测试。如果仅在没有POES的情况下获得表明PZA耐药的可判读结果,则应通过吡嗪酰胺酶测定或传统比例法来确认该结果。不建议对所有临床菌株在BACTEC试验中常规省略POES,因为假耐药率高得令人无法接受。