Suppr超能文献

轻度痴呆的神经心理学损害模式:阿尔茨海默病与多发梗死性痴呆的比较。

Patterns of neuropsychological impairment in mild dementia: a comparison between Alzheimer's disease and multi-infarct dementia.

作者信息

Padovani A, Di Piero V, Bragoni M, Iacoboni M, Gualdi G F, Lenzi G L

机构信息

II Clinica Neurologica, Università Studi di Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 1995 Dec;92(6):433-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1995.tb00477.x.

Abstract

The objective was to investigate the clinical and psychometric differences between patients with dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT) and patients with multi-infarct dementia (MID), matched for age, sex, education, and severity. Sixteen patients with DAT, 16 patients with MID, and 30 healthy individuals, were drawn from a longitudinal study on aging and dementia. Subjects with medical or previous mental disorders were excluded. DAT and controls with focal brain abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were excluded. Diagnosis of dementia was carried out according to DSM-III-R criteria. Dementia severity was staged using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale, and only patients with a score of 0.5-1 on CDR were studied. The main outcome measures were quantitative clinical scales of the assessment of global mental status, depression and anxiety, as well as a wide battery of neuropsychological tests for the evaluation of executive/conceptual functions and memory, as well as attention verbal ability, and visuospatial skill functions. The performance of demented patients compared to normal controls was affected on all measurements except for depression and anxiety. DAT patients showed compared to MID patients a greater extent of impairment on tasks assessing verbal comprehension and memory while MID patients were more significantly impaired on measures of frontal lobe functioning. Clinically matched DAT and MID patients show a differential pattern of neuropsychological impairment when studied in an early stage of dementia and with a mild degree of severity. Such patterns might be of value for the development of clinical diagnostic criteria.

摘要

目的是研究年龄、性别、教育程度和严重程度相匹配的阿尔茨海默型痴呆(DAT)患者与多发梗死性痴呆(MID)患者之间的临床和心理测量差异。从一项关于衰老和痴呆的纵向研究中选取了16例DAT患者、16例MID患者和30名健康个体。排除患有医学疾病或既往有精神障碍的受试者。排除磁共振成像(MRI)显示有局灶性脑异常的DAT患者和对照组。根据DSM-III-R标准进行痴呆诊断。使用临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)对痴呆严重程度进行分期,仅研究CDR评分为0.5-1的患者。主要结局指标包括评估整体精神状态、抑郁和焦虑的定量临床量表,以及一系列用于评估执行/概念功能、记忆、注意力言语能力和视觉空间技能功能的神经心理学测试。与正常对照组相比,痴呆患者在除抑郁和焦虑外的所有测量指标上的表现均受到影响。与MID患者相比,DAT患者在评估言语理解和记忆的任务上受损程度更大,而MID患者在额叶功能测量上受损更显著。在痴呆早期且严重程度较轻时进行研究,临床匹配的DAT和MID患者表现出不同的神经心理学损害模式。这些模式可能对临床诊断标准的制定有价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验