Eckardt U, Eckardt C
Augenklinik, Städtische Kliniken, Frankfurt/M.-Höchst.
Ophthalmologe. 1995 Oct;92(5):626-30.
In recent years idiopathic macular hole has become an increasingly frequent indication for vitrectomy. To our knowledge, the literature contains no studies comparing binocular vision before and after vitrectomy. We therefore carried out a prospective study not only on visual acuity following vitrectomy but also, for the first time, on binocular vision. Stereopsis and fusion were evaluated in 37 patients with idiopathic macular holes (stage I-IV) using Bagolini striated glasses, the Titmus stereotest (contour stereopsis), the random dot test (global stereopsis), the Worth four-dot test and the phase-difference haploscope. The tests were performed preoperatively and 10-12 weeks after vitrectomy. Two patients with stage I macular hole showed no loss of stereopsis in conventional tests. One patient, however, exhibited suppression tendencies with partial exclusion. The 18 patients with stage II macular hole had a relative good visual acuity of 0.2-0.6, but subnormal binocular vision with marked suppression of foveal images. Postoperatively, the majority of these patients had symptom-free binocular vision and good stereopsis. Some, however, continued to experience foveal exclusion. Patients with macular hole stage III and IV (n = 17) had the poorest results. Although the postoperative visual acuity improved by 2 to 3 points in some patients (n = 6), in approximately one third it remained limited to global peripheral binocular vision. In summary, our findings show that even in early stages (I and II), macular hole can cause not only reduced visual acuity but also impairment or, in stage II, even loss of binocular vision. Vitrectomy in these early stages often leads to an overall improvement in visual acuity and binocular vision, whereas in more advanced stages vitrectomy often does not affect visual acuity and binocular vision. This should be taken into account when weighing up the indications for surgery.
近年来,特发性黄斑裂孔已成为越来越常见的玻璃体切割术适应证。据我们所知,文献中尚无关于玻璃体切割术前后双眼视觉比较的研究。因此,我们不仅对玻璃体切割术后的视力进行了前瞻性研究,而且首次对双眼视觉进行了研究。使用巴戈利尼线状镜、蒂特马斯立体视觉测试(轮廓立体视觉)、随机点测试(整体立体视觉)、沃思四点测试和相差检眼镜,对37例特发性黄斑裂孔(Ⅰ - Ⅳ期)患者的立体视觉和融合功能进行了评估。这些测试在术前以及玻璃体切割术后10 - 12周进行。两名Ⅰ期黄斑裂孔患者在传统测试中未表现出立体视觉丧失。然而,有一名患者表现出抑制倾向和部分排除现象。18例Ⅱ期黄斑裂孔患者视力相对较好,为0.2 - 0.6,但双眼视觉异常,中央凹图像明显受抑制。术后,这些患者中的大多数双眼视觉无症状且立体视觉良好。然而,一些患者仍持续存在中央凹排除现象。Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期黄斑裂孔患者(n = 17)结果最差。虽然部分患者(n = 6)术后视力提高了2至3个等级,但约三分之一患者的视力仍仅局限于整体周边双眼视觉。总之,我们的研究结果表明,即使在早期阶段(Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期),黄斑裂孔不仅会导致视力下降,还会损害双眼视觉,在Ⅱ期甚至会导致双眼视觉丧失。在这些早期阶段进行玻璃体切割术通常会使视力和双眼视觉总体得到改善,而在更晚期阶段,玻璃体切割术往往不会影响视力和双眼视觉。在权衡手术适应证时应考虑到这一点。