Leborgne F, Fowler J F, Leborgne J H, Zubizarreta E, Chappell R
Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jul 15;35(5):907-14. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(96)00184-8.
To establish an optimum fractionation for medium dose rate (MDR) brachytherapy from retrospective data of patients treated with different MDR schedules in comparison with a low dose rate (LDR) schedule.
The study population consists of consecutive Stage IB-IIA-IIB patients who received radiotherapy alone with full dose brachytherapy plus external beam pelvic and parametrial irradiation from 1986-1993. Patients also receiving surgery or chemotherapy were excluded. The LDR group (n = 102, median follow-up: 80 months) received a median dose to Point A of two 32.5 Gy fractions at 0.44 Gy/h plus 18 Gy of external whole pelvic irradiation. The MDR1 group (n = 30, median follow-up: 45 months) received a mean dose of two 32 Gy fractions at 1.68 Gy/h. An individual dose reduction of 12.5% was planned for this group according to the Manchester experience, but only a 4.8% dose reduction was achieved. The MDR2 group (n = 10, median follow-up: 36 months) received a dose of two 24 Gy fractions at 1.65 Gy/h. The MDR3 group (n = 10, median follow-up 33 months) received a mean dose of three 15.3 Gy fractions at 1.64 Gy/h. And finally, the MDR4 group (n = 38, median follow-up: 24 months) received six 7.7 Gy fractions from two pulses 6 h apart in each of three insertions at 1.61 Gy/h. The median external pelvic dose to MDR schedules was between 12 and 20 Gy. The linear quadratic (LQ) formula was used to calculate the biologically effective dose (BED) to tumor (Gy10) and rectum (Gy3), assuming T1/2 for repair = 1.5 h.
The crude central recurrence rate was 6% for LDR (mean BED = 95.4 Gy10) and 10% for MDR4 (mean BED = 77.0 Gy10) (p = NS). The remaining MDR groups had no recurrences. Grade 2 and 3 rectal or bladder complications were 0% for LDR (rectal BED = 109 Gy3) 83% for MDR1 (BED = 206 Gy3), and 30% for MDR3 (BED = 127 Gy3). The MDR2 and MDR4 groups presented no complications (BED, 123 Gy3, and 105 Gy3, respectively). The LQ formula appears to correlate with late complications of the different MDR regimens. A BED above 125 Gy3 was associated with Grade 2 + 3 rectal complications. Adequate central tumor control may be compromised with a tumor BED below 90-95 Gy10.
Medium dose rate brachytherapy at 1.6 Gy/h to Point A has a marked dose rate effect. Increased fractionation is the cost of overcoming the less favorable therapeutic ratio for MDR than for LDR. A larger (25%) reduction of brachytherapy dose than previously reported is also necessary. Our most recently developed schedule for Stage I-II patients is three insertions on three treatment days with six 8.0 Gy brachytherapy fractionations, two on each treatment day, following or preceding an external whole pelvis dose of 18 Gy, and followed by additional external parametrial dose.
通过回顾不同中剂量率(MDR)放疗方案治疗患者的数据,并与低剂量率(LDR)方案进行比较,建立中剂量率近距离放疗的最佳分割方案。
研究人群包括1986年至1993年间接受单纯放疗的连续IB-IIA-IIB期患者,放疗采用全剂量近距离放疗加盆腔及宫旁外照射。排除同时接受手术或化疗的患者。LDR组(n = 102,中位随访时间:80个月)A点中位剂量为两个32.5 Gy分割,剂量率0.44 Gy/h,外加18 Gy全盆腔外照射。MDR1组(n = 30,中位随访时间:45个月)接受两个32 Gy分割,剂量率1.68 Gy/h的平均剂量。根据曼彻斯特经验,该组计划个体剂量降低12.5%,但实际仅降低了4.8%。MDR2组(n = 10,中位随访时间:36个月)接受两个24 Gy分割,剂量率1.65 Gy/h。MDR3组(n = 10,中位随访时间33个月)接受三个15.3 Gy分割,剂量率1.64 Gy/h的平均剂量。最后,MDR4组(n = 38,中位随访时间:24个月)在每次插入三个施源器时,每次脉冲间隔6小时,共六个7.7 Gy分割,剂量率1.61 Gy/h。MDR方案的盆腔外照射中位剂量在12至20 Gy之间。采用线性二次(LQ)公式计算肿瘤(Gy10)和直肠(Gy3)的生物等效剂量(BED),假设修复的半值时间(T1/2)= 1.5小时。
LDR组(平均BED = 95.4 Gy10)的粗中央复发率为6%,MDR4组(平均BED = 77.0 Gy10)为10%(p = 无统计学差异)。其余MDR组无复发。LDR组2级和3级直肠或膀胱并发症发生率为0%(直肠BED = 109 Gy3),MDR1组为83%(BED = 206 Gy3),MDR3组为30%(BED = 127 Gy3)。MDR2组和MDR4组无并发症(BED分别为123 Gy3和105 Gy3)。LQ公式似乎与不同MDR方案的晚期并发症相关。BED高于125 Gy3与2 + 3级直肠并发症相关。肿瘤BED低于90 - 95 Gy10可能会影响中央肿瘤的充分控制。
A点剂量率为1.6 Gy/h的中剂量率近距离放疗有显著的剂量率效应。增加分割次数是克服MDR与LDR相比治疗比欠佳的代价。近距离放疗剂量也需要比之前报道的更大幅度(25%)降低。我们为I-II期患者最新制定的方案是在三个治疗日进行三次插植,共六个8.0 Gy近距离放疗分割,每个治疗日两次,在18 Gy全盆腔外照射之前或之后进行,随后追加宫旁外照射剂量。