Goodlin R C
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Sep;88(3):467-9. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00209-8.
To determine whether planned anterior vaginotomy is a logical and safe means of avoiding a uterine scar with term abdominal delivery. I recorded the complications of the technique and whether vaginal birth after anterior vaginotomy occurred. Thirteen anterior vaginotomies were done when the vagina had advanced during prolonged second stage. The procedure appears safe, although one patient had a postpartum bladder flap hematoma and one had gross hematuria postpartum. Three had postpartum endometritis and one was given a blood transfusion. In the six with records of follow-up pregnancies, two had elective cesareans, four attempted vaginal birth after vaginotomy with two failures (delivered by cesarean). The two successful procedures were uncomplicated. I conclude that unintended anterior vaginotomy should be coded. Such coding and analysis are required before it can be recommended that anterior vaginotomy replace cesarean after considerable vaginal advancement occurs. Vaginal advancement (and cervical retraction) during the second stage of labor requires further study.
为了确定计划性前路阴道切开术是否是足月剖宫产时避免子宫瘢痕形成的合理且安全的方法。我记录了该技术的并发症以及前路阴道切开术后是否发生阴道分娩。当第二产程延长且阴道进展时,进行了13例前路阴道切开术。该手术似乎是安全的,尽管有1例患者出现产后膀胱皮瓣血肿,1例患者产后出现肉眼血尿。3例发生产后子宫内膜炎,1例接受了输血。在有后续妊娠记录的6例患者中,2例行选择性剖宫产,4例在阴道切开术后尝试阴道分娩,其中2例失败(行剖宫产)。2例成功的手术过程均无并发症。我得出结论,意外的前路阴道切开术应进行编码。在建议前路阴道切开术在阴道明显进展后替代剖宫产之前,需要进行此类编码和分析。第二产程中阴道进展(以及宫颈回缩)需要进一步研究。