Suppr超能文献

[使用带有患者自控模块的便携式0.5毫升/小时输注器持续硬膜外输注丁丙诺啡和布比卡因联合用药用于术后镇痛的效果]

[The effect of continuous epidural infusion of combination of buprenorphine and bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief using a portable 0.5 ml.h-1 type infuser with patient control module].

作者信息

Komatsu H, Matsumoto S, Nagasaki G, Hori M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Hiraka General Hospital, Yokote.

出版信息

Masui. 1996 Jun;45(6):735-40.

PMID:8752776
Abstract

Using a portable 0.5 ml.h-1 type infuser with Patient Control Module (Baxter infuser BB+ PCM), we compared patients receiving continuous epidural infusion with patients using self controlled analgesia system for postoperative analgesia after upper abdominal surgery. Twenty-one patients were randomized into three groups: group I (n = 7) received 20 micrograms.h-1 of buprenorphine (Bu) with additional 20 micrograms of Bu; group II (n = 7) 20 micrograms.h-1 of Bu plus 1 mg.h-1 of bupivacaine (Bup) with additional 20 micrograms of Bu plus 1 mg of Bup; group III (n = 7) 20 micrograms.h-1 of Bu plus 2 mg.h-1 of Bup with additional 20 micrograms of Bu plus 2 mg of Bup. In all three groups, patients received supplemental Bu 0.1 mg intramuscularly as needed. During 48-hours postoperatively, we evaluated verbal descriptor pain scale, sedative scale, visual analogue scale, supplemental doses of Bu, and side effects. Total doses of Bu during the first 12 hours were significantly larger than those during other 12-hour period in all the groups (P < 0.05). In each period during the 12 to 48-hours after operation, the percentage of the patients who needed no supplemental Bu was 71.4-100%, which is higher than during the 0 to 12-hours (47.7%). There was no significant difference in verbal descriptor pain scale, sedative scale, visual analogue scale, and the incidence of side-effect among the three groups. Continuous epidural infusion with Bu using a portable 0.5 ml.h-1 type infuser with patient control module was effective for alleviating postoperative pain except in the first 12-hour period. However, addition of Bup to Bu did not improve the quality of postoperative epidural analgesia.

摘要

使用带有患者自控模块的便携式0.5毫升/小时输注器(百特输注器BB + PCM),我们比较了接受连续硬膜外输注的患者与使用自控镇痛系统进行上腹部手术后镇痛的患者。21例患者被随机分为三组:第一组(n = 7)接受20微克/小时的丁丙诺啡(Bu),额外追加20微克Bu;第二组(n = 7)接受20微克/小时的Bu加1毫克/小时的布比卡因(Bup),额外追加20微克Bu加1毫克Bup;第三组(n = 7)接受20微克/小时的Bu加2毫克/小时的Bup,额外追加20微克Bu加2毫克Bup。在所有三组中,患者根据需要肌肉注射补充0.1毫克Bu。术后48小时内,我们评估了语言描述疼痛量表、镇静量表、视觉模拟量表、Bu的补充剂量和副作用。所有组中,前12小时的Bu总剂量显著大于其他12小时时间段(P < 0.05)。在术后12至48小时的每个时间段,无需补充Bu的患者百分比为71.4 - 100%,高于0至12小时(47.7%)。三组之间在语言描述疼痛量表、镇静量表、视觉模拟量表和副作用发生率方面无显著差异。使用带有患者自控模块的便携式0.5毫升/小时输注器进行连续硬膜外输注Bu除了在最初12小时时间段外,对减轻术后疼痛有效。然而,在Bu中添加Bup并未改善术后硬膜外镇痛的质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验