• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管成形术后再狭窄患者冠状动脉球囊预扩张前后及支架植入后心肌灌注储备的比较。

Comparison of myocardial perfusion reserve before and after coronary balloon predilatation and after stent implantation in patients with postangioplasty restenosis.

作者信息

Haude M, Caspari G, Baumgart D, Brennecke R, Meyer J, Erbel R

机构信息

Cardiology Department, University of Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Circulation. 1996 Aug 1;94(3):286-97. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.286.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.94.3.286
PMID:8759068
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stents provide a scaffold for coronary arteries after angioplasty and inhibit elastic recoil.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 25 patients with postangioplasty restenosis of the left anterior descending artery, ECG-gated digital subtraction coronary angiograms were recorded at baseline and during hyperemia (12 mg papaverine IC) before and after balloon predilatation (PTCA), after implantation of a Palmaz-Schatz stent, and after 6 months. Densitometric evaluation revealed different time and density parameters to calculate two definitions of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR1 and MPR2) and maximum flow ratio (MaxFR). Poststenotic MPR1 increased from 1.57 +/- 0.14 to 2.59 +/- 0.86 after PTCA and to 3.10 +/- 0.41 after stenting, with 2.90 +/- 0.65 at follow-up (ANOVA, P < .05), while reference MPR1 remained unchanged at 3.10 +/- 0.40. Poststenotic MPR2 increased from 1.36 +/- 0.28 to 2.50 +/- 1.20 and to 3.40 +/- 0.58, respectively, with 3.20 +/- 0.92 at follow-up (ANOVA, P < .05), while reference MPR2 remained unchanged at 3.40 +/- 0.60. MaxFR was 2.13 +/- 0.53 after PTCA, elasticity 2.83 +/- 0.35 after stenting, and 2.73 +/- 0.58 at follow-up (ANOVA, P < .05). A good correlation was found between minimal stenotic luminal diameter and MPR1 or MPR2 (r = .87 and r = .94) and between luminal gain and MaxFR (r = .75). A negative correlation was measured between recoil and MPR1, MPR2, and MaxFR (r = -.80, r = -.86, and r = -.83). At follow-up, a steeper correlation was found between MPR and minimal stenosis diameter (MPR1: slope, 0.52 versus 0.91; MPR2: slope, 1.48 versus 1.95) and between MaxFR and net lumen gain (slope, 0.78 versus 1.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary stent implantation in patients with postangioplasty restenosis normalized poststenotic myocardial perfusion immediately as a result of a larger postprocedural lumen and a more pronounced inhibition of elastic recoil. After 6 months this benefit was sustained despite progressive lumen loss.

摘要

背景

支架为血管成形术后的冠状动脉提供支架结构并抑制弹性回缩。

方法与结果

对25例左前降支血管成形术后再狭窄患者,在基线时、球囊预扩张(PTCA)前后、植入Palmaz-Schatz支架后及6个月时,记录心电图门控数字减影冠状动脉造影。密度测定评估显示,计算心肌灌注储备(MPR1和MPR2)和最大血流比(MaxFR)的两种定义有不同的时间和密度参数。狭窄后MPR1在PTCA后从1.57±0.14增加到2.59±0.86,支架植入后增加到3.10±0.41,随访时为2.90±0.65(方差分析,P<.05),而参照MPR1保持不变,为3.10±0.40。狭窄后MPR2分别从1.36±0.28增加到2.50±1.20和3.40±0.58,随访时为3.20±0.92(方差分析,P<.05),而参照MPR2保持不变,为3.40±0.60。PTCA后MaxFR为2.13±0.53,支架植入后弹性为2.83±0.35,随访时为2.73±0.58(方差分析,P<.05)。最小狭窄管腔直径与MPR1或MPR2之间(r=.87和r=.94)以及管腔增益与MaxFR之间(r=.75)发现有良好的相关性。回缩与MPR1、MPR2和MaxFR之间呈负相关(r=-.80、r=-.86和r=-.83)。随访时,MPR与最小狭窄直径之间(MPR1:斜率,0.52对0.91;MPR2:斜率,1.48对1.95)以及MaxFR与净管腔增益之间(斜率,

相似文献

1
Comparison of myocardial perfusion reserve before and after coronary balloon predilatation and after stent implantation in patients with postangioplasty restenosis.血管成形术后再狭窄患者冠状动脉球囊预扩张前后及支架植入后心肌灌注储备的比较。
Circulation. 1996 Aug 1;94(3):286-97. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.286.
2
[Normalization of myocardial perfusion reserve after coronary stent implantation in comparison with balloon angioplasty alone].[冠状动脉支架植入术后与单纯球囊血管成形术相比心肌灌注储备的正常化]
Z Kardiol. 1996 Apr;85(4):260-72.
3
Quantitative analysis of elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty and after intracoronary implantation of balloon-expandable Palmaz-Schatz stents.球囊血管成形术后及冠状动脉内植入球囊扩张式Palmaz-Schatz支架后的弹性回缩定量分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jan;21(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90713-b.
4
[New developments in parameter-oriented roentgen densitometry perfusion analysis within the scope of heart catheter studies].[心脏导管研究范围内参数导向的X线密度测定灌注分析的新进展]
Herz. 1997 Apr;22(2):72-86. doi: 10.1007/BF03044306.
5
Emergency coronary stenting for dissection during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: angiographic follow-up after stenting and after repeat angioplasty of the stented segment.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术期间夹层的紧急冠状动脉支架置入术:支架置入后及支架段重复血管成形术后的血管造影随访
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Apr;23(5):1053-60. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90589-4.
6
Differences of regional coronary flow reserve assessed by adenosine thallium-201 scintigraphy early and six months after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or stent implantation.
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Nov 15;78(10):1097-102. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)90059-4.
7
Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗器械再狭窄倾向的差异。球囊血管成形术、定向旋切术、支架植入术和准分子激光血管成形术的定量血管造影比较。CARPORT、MERCATOR、MARCATOR、PARK和BENESTENT试验组。
Eur Heart J. 1995 Oct;16(10):1331-46. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060740.
8
Emergent use of balloon-expandable coronary artery stenting for failed percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.对于经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术失败后紧急使用球囊扩张式冠状动脉支架置入术。
Circulation. 1992 Sep;86(3):812-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.3.812.
9
Elastic recoil following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation.经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术及Palmaz-Schatz支架植入后的弹性回缩
J Invasive Cardiol. 1995 Jul-Aug;7(6):165-72.
10
Mechanisms of restenosis and redilation within coronary stents--quantitative angiographic assessment.冠状动脉支架内再狭窄和再扩张的机制——定量血管造影评估
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Apr;21(5):1166-74. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90241-r.

引用本文的文献

1
In Acute Myocardial Infarction Liver Parameters Are Associated With Stenosis Diameter.在急性心肌梗死中,肝脏参数与狭窄直径相关。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(6):e2807. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002807.
2
Release of Intracoronary Microparticles during Stent Implantation into Stable Atherosclerotic Lesions under Protection with an Aspiration Device.在使用抽吸装置保护下将支架植入稳定动脉粥样硬化病变过程中冠状动脉内微粒的释放
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0124904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124904. eCollection 2015.
3
Coronary aspirate TNFα reflects saphenous vein bypass graft restenosis risk in diabetic patients.
冠状动脉抽吸 TNFα 反映糖尿病患者隐静脉旁路移植再狭窄的风险。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013 Jan 10;12:12. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-12.
4
3D assessment of myocardial perfusion parameter combined with 3D reconstructed coronary artery tree from digital coronary angiograms.结合数字化冠状动脉造影的三维重建冠状动脉树对心肌灌注参数进行三维评估。
Int J Card Imaging. 2000 Feb;16(1):1-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1006216221695.
5
[Anti-ischemic effect of verapamil within the scope of interventional recanalization].[维拉帕米在介入再通范围内的抗缺血作用]
Herz. 1999 Nov;24(7):581-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03044230.
6
Coronary microembolization--its role in acute coronary syndromes and interventions.冠状动脉微栓塞——其在急性冠状动脉综合征及干预措施中的作用
Herz. 1999 Nov;24(7):558-75. doi: 10.1007/BF03044228.
7
Effect of stenting on coronary flow velocity reserve: comparison of coil and tubular stents.支架置入对冠状动脉血流储备的影响:线圈型支架与管状支架的比较。
Heart. 1999 Oct;82(4):465-70. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.4.465.
8
[New developments in parameter-oriented roentgen densitometry perfusion analysis within the scope of heart catheter studies].[心脏导管研究范围内参数导向的X线密度测定灌注分析的新进展]
Herz. 1997 Apr;22(2):72-86. doi: 10.1007/BF03044306.