Bernat M, Lecoq C, Lempidakis M, Martin G, Aswad R, Poitout D G
Service Chirurgie-Traumatologie, CHU Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, Marseille.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1996;82(2):137-44.
The purpose of our study is to analyse the indications, results and limits of secondary internal fixation after external fixation for open fracture of the lower limb.
Our series covered 21 patients treated between 1991 and 1994. There were 17 men and 4 women. Tibia was affected 17 times and femur 5 times (one bifocal fracture). In Gustilo's classification, we had 1 case of type 1, 12 of type II and 8 of type III.
We used 15 times the FESSA External Fixator and 6 times a monotube external fixator in emergency. We have done secondary 11 intra medullary nailing and 11 patients were treated by plating (one patient had both) 13 patients had a bone graft (cortico-cancellous graft). In the first group of patients (10 cases), the initial treatment gave us good results for both skin and bone healing. The external fixation was replaced by an internal one in order to accelerate bone consolidation and to allow an early weight-bearing. Removal of the external fixation was made at an average of 4 months postoperative. In the Second group (11 cases) the internal fixation was proposed because of an insufficiency of the external fixation leading to complications as: non union, mal union and bone defects. External fixation was removed in a mean time of 8 months. Internal fixation was completed by local bone autograft.
17 patients have been reviewed. Consolidation occurred with an average of 6 months after internal fixation 1 to 24 months. We had no deep infection but only 2 superficial ones.
We chose 2 types of indication, and we called them programmed and for necessity. The first group of 10 patients whose stain was moderate and whose initial setting up had permitted a perfect anatomic reduction with a rapid wound healing. Internal fixation was performed after a short duration of external fixator. An early weight bearing was allowed so that the functional recovery could be obtained quickly. The second group is represented by patients whose internal fixation was done for non union, malunion or bone defect. In such a case autogenous cancellous graft was used to fill the defect.
本研究旨在分析下肢开放性骨折外固定后二期内固定的适应证、结果及局限性。
我们的研究系列涵盖了1991年至1994年间治疗的21例患者。其中男性17例,女性4例。胫骨骨折17例,股骨骨折5例(1例为双焦点骨折)。在 Gustilo 分类中,Ⅰ型1例,Ⅱ型12例,Ⅲ型8例。
急诊时,我们使用 FESSA 外固定器15次,单管外固定器6次。我们进行了11次二期髓内钉固定,11例患者采用钢板固定(1例患者两者均用),13例患者进行了植骨(皮质松质骨移植)。在第一组患者(10例)中,初始治疗在皮肤和骨愈合方面均取得了良好效果。为加速骨愈合及允许早期负重,将外固定更换为内固定。外固定平均在术后4个月拆除。在第二组(11例)中,由于外固定不足导致不愈合、畸形愈合和骨缺损等并发症而进行内固定。外固定平均在8个月时拆除。内固定通过局部自体骨移植完成。
对17例患者进行了复查。内固定后平均6个月(1至24个月)实现骨愈合。无深部感染,仅2例浅表感染。
我们选择了两种适应证类型,分别称为计划性和必要性。第一组10例患者,其创面中等,初始固定允许完美的解剖复位且伤口愈合迅速。在外固定短时间后进行内固定。允许早期负重以便快速获得功能恢复。第二组以因不愈合、畸形愈合或骨缺损而进行内固定的患者为代表。在这种情况下,使用自体松质骨移植填充缺损。