Terhell A J, Haarbrink M, Abadi K, Bronneberg D C, Tieleman M C, Asri M, Yazdanbakhsh M
Department of Parasitology, Leiden University, Netherlands.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996 Mar-Apr;90(2):196-8. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90140-6.
In a previous study performed in south Sulawesi (Sulawesi Selatan), Indonesia, we established that the immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a suitable community diagnostic method and that it can distinguish areas of high and low prevalences within short distances. In an attempt to make this diagnostic tool more applicable in the field, a comparative study using serum and blood collected on filter paper was undertaken with 568 individuals living in 2 areas with different endemicity for brugian filariasis in south Sulawesi. In Mamuju district, where the microfilaria (mf) prevalence of the studied individuals was 18.4%, antifilarial IgG4 was present in 73.1% of the venepuncture samples and 72.5% of the filter paper samples, respectively. In Mangkutane district, where lymphatic filariasis is transmitted at a low level (mf rate 2.4%), antifilarial IgG4 was detected in 35.5% and 39.9% of similar samples, respectively. There was no significant difference in the IgG4 detection rate determined from venepuncture and filter paper samples from the same donors (P = 0.124), and the IgG4 values were highly correlated (p = 0.97, P < 0.001, n = 568). These results indicate that the filter paper technique for collection of blood samples is a suitable alternative to venepuncture for use in the IgG4 ELISA.
在印度尼西亚南苏拉威西省(Sulawesi Selatan)之前开展的一项研究中,我们证实免疫球蛋白G4(IgG4)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)是一种适用的社区诊断方法,并且它能够在短距离内区分高流行区和低流行区。为使该诊断工具在现场更具适用性,我们对居住在南苏拉威西省两个布鲁氏丝虫病流行程度不同地区的568人,开展了一项使用滤纸采集的血清和血液样本的对比研究。在所研究个体的微丝蚴(mf)流行率为18.4%的马穆朱区,抗丝虫IgG4分别在73.1%的静脉穿刺样本和72.5%的滤纸样本中存在。在淋巴丝虫病低水平传播(mf率2.4%)的曼库塔内区,类似样本中抗丝虫IgG4的检测率分别为35.5%和39.9%。同一供体的静脉穿刺样本和滤纸样本的IgG4检测率无显著差异(P = 0.124),且IgG4值高度相关(p = 0.97,P < 0.001,n = 568)。这些结果表明,在IgG4 ELISA中,滤纸采血技术是静脉穿刺的一种合适替代方法。