Herpin D, Ragot S, Vaïsse B, Ferrandis J, Baguet J P, Mallion J M, Poggi L, Demange J
Service Cardiologie B. CHRU La Milètrie, Poitiers, France.
Therapie. 1996 Jan-Feb;51(1):11-7.
We retrospectively studied 216 mild to moderate hypertensive patients receiving either an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or a calcium antagonist (CA), as a once-a-day monotherapy; their blood pressure had been measured using both a sphygmomanometer and an ambulatory blood pressure recorder. Numerous discrepancies were found between the two methods of blood pressure measurement with respect to systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), as well as pulse pressure (PP). Clinic blood pressure measurement did not show any significant differences between the effects of ACEI and those of CA, whereas ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) showed that in patients with normal ambulatory blood pressure (so-called 'white coat' hypertensive patients), ACEI only (but not CA) significantly lowered SBP, DBP and PP. Accordingly, a threshold of efficacy was sought: it appeared to be lower for ACEI than for CA (120/80 vs 140/85 mmHg). Furthermore, for a given degree of DBP lowering, SBP and PP were more lowered by ACEI than by CA, indicating a greater effect of ACEI on arterial compliance. Likewise, for a given level of mean blood pressure, SBP and PP were lower and DBP slightly higher in patients on ACEI than in those on CA. Our data are consistent with some recent papers, emphasizing a heightened activity of the renin-angiotensin system in 'white coat' hypertensive patients.
我们回顾性研究了216例轻度至中度高血压患者,这些患者接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或钙拮抗剂(CA)作为每日一次的单一疗法;他们的血压通过血压计和动态血压记录仪进行测量。在收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)以及脉压(PP)方面,两种血压测量方法之间发现了许多差异。诊室血压测量显示,ACEI和CA的效果之间没有任何显著差异,而动态血压测量(ABPM)显示,在动态血压正常的患者(所谓的“白大衣”高血压患者)中,仅ACEI(而非CA)能显著降低SBP、DBP和PP。因此,寻求了一个疗效阈值:ACEI的阈值似乎低于CA(120/80对140/85 mmHg)。此外,对于给定程度的DBP降低,ACEI降低SBP和PP的幅度大于CA,表明ACEI对动脉顺应性的影响更大。同样,对于给定的平均血压水平,服用ACEI的患者的SBP和PP较低,DBP略高于服用CA的患者。我们的数据与最近的一些论文一致,这些论文强调“白大衣”高血压患者肾素 - 血管紧张素系统的活性增强。