• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰乳腺癌筛查项目(DOM)中特定年龄的敏感性和停留时间:不同方法的比较。

Age specific sensitivity and sojourn time in a breast cancer screening programme (DOM) in The Netherlands: a comparison of different methods.

作者信息

Brekelmans C T, Westers P, Faber J A, Peeters P H, Collette H J

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Feb;50(1):68-71. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.1.68.

DOI:10.1136/jech.50.1.68
PMID:8762357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1060207/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To estimate age dependent sensitivity and sojourn time in a breast cancer screening programme by different methods.

POPULATION AND METHODS

The study population comprised women participating in the DOM project--the Utrecht screening programme for the early detection of breast cancer. Breast cancer screening prevalence data and incidence rates after a negative screen were used to estimate age specific sensitivity and mean sojourn time by different methods.

MAIN RESULTS

Maximum likelihood estimates of the mean sojourn time varied from one year for women aged 40-49 years to three years for women over the age of 54. Sensitivity was calculated by two different methods. Both pointed to a high sensitivity (around 100%) in the age groups 40-49 and over 55 years. For women aged 50-54, the sensitivity varied from 63% to 100%, depending on the method used and the value of the baseline incidence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Different methods of estimating sensitivity pointed at an acceptable level in women over and under 50 years of age. Sojourn time, and thus the tumour growth rate, seemed to be age dependent. This could mean that the until now disappointing screening results in women under 50 years of age are not so much a result of low sensitivity as of a relatively high tumour growth rate in younger women.

摘要

研究目的

通过不同方法估计乳腺癌筛查项目中年龄依赖性敏感性和停留时间。

研究对象与方法

研究人群包括参与DOM项目(乌得勒支乳腺癌早期检测筛查项目)的女性。利用乳腺癌筛查患病率数据和阴性筛查后的发病率,通过不同方法估计年龄特异性敏感性和平均停留时间。

主要结果

平均停留时间的最大似然估计值在40 - 49岁女性中为1年,在54岁以上女性中为3年。敏感性通过两种不同方法计算。两种方法均表明40 - 49岁和55岁以上年龄组的敏感性较高(约100%)。对于50 - 54岁女性,敏感性在63%至100%之间变化,这取决于所使用的方法和基线发病率的值。

结论

不同的敏感性估计方法表明50岁以上和以下女性的敏感性处于可接受水平。停留时间以及肿瘤生长速率似乎与年龄有关。这可能意味着,迄今为止50岁以下女性令人失望的筛查结果,与其说是敏感性低的结果,不如说是年轻女性肿瘤生长速率相对较高的结果。

相似文献

1
Age specific sensitivity and sojourn time in a breast cancer screening programme (DOM) in The Netherlands: a comparison of different methods.荷兰乳腺癌筛查项目(DOM)中特定年龄的敏感性和停留时间:不同方法的比较。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Feb;50(1):68-71. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.1.68.
2
Breast cancer after a negative screen: follow-up of women participating in the DOM Screening Programme.筛查结果为阴性后的乳腺癌:参与DOM筛查项目女性的随访情况
Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A(4-5):893-5. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90144-q.
3
Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.荷兰奈梅亨的长期乳腺癌筛查:1975年至1992年的九轮筛查
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Jun;50(3):353-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.3.353.
4
Sojourn time, sensitivity and positive predictive value of mammography screening for breast cancer in women aged 40-49.40至49岁女性乳腺钼靶筛查对乳腺癌的筛查时间、敏感性及阳性预测值
Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;25(6):1139-45. doi: 10.1093/ije/25.6.1139.
5
Estimating key parameters in periodic breast cancer screening-application to the Canadian National Breast Screening Study data.估算周期性乳腺癌筛查中的关键参数-应用于加拿大国家乳腺癌筛查研究数据。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;34(4):429-33. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.04.001.
6
Test sensitivity of mammography and mean sojourn time over 40 years of breast cancer screening in Nijmegen (The Netherlands).荷兰奈梅亨40年乳腺癌筛查中乳腺X线摄影的检测敏感性及平均停留时间
J Med Screen. 2019 Sep;26(3):147-153. doi: 10.1177/0969141318814869. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
7
Estimating age group-dependent sensitivity and mean sojourn time in colorectal cancer screening.估算结直肠癌筛查中年龄相关的敏感性和平均居留时间。
J Med Screen. 2019 Mar;26(1):19-25. doi: 10.1177/0969141318790775. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Estimating mean sojourn time and screening test sensitivity in breast cancer mammography screening: new results.估计乳腺癌乳房X线筛查中的平均停留时间和筛查试验敏感性:新结果
J Med Screen. 2005;12(4):172-8. doi: 10.1258/096914105775220732.
9
10
The epidemiological profile of women with an interval cancer in the DOM screening programme.DOM筛查项目中患有间隔期癌症的女性的流行病学概况。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1994;30(3):223-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00665964.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling the overdiagnosis of breast cancer due to mammography screening in women aged 40 to 49 in the United Kingdom.对英国40至49岁女性因乳腺钼靶筛查导致的乳腺癌过度诊断进行建模。
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Nov 29;14(6):R152. doi: 10.1186/bcr3365.
2
Thermography based breast cancer detection using texture features and Support Vector Machine.基于纹理特征和支持向量机的热成像乳腺癌检测。
J Med Syst. 2012 Jun;36(3):1503-10. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9611-z. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
3
Are breast cancer navigation programs cost-effective? Evidence from the Chicago Cancer Navigation Project.乳腺癌导航项目是否具有成本效益?来自芝加哥癌症导航项目的证据。
Health Policy. 2011 Jan;99(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.07.008. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
4
Estimating key parameters in periodic breast cancer screening-application to the Canadian National Breast Screening Study data.估算周期性乳腺癌筛查中的关键参数-应用于加拿大国家乳腺癌筛查研究数据。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;34(4):429-33. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.04.001.
5
Toward optimal screening strategies for older women. Costs, benefits, and harms of breast cancer screening by age, biology, and health status.迈向老年女性的最佳筛查策略。按年龄、生物学特征和健康状况进行乳腺癌筛查的成本、益处及危害。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):487-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0116.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Age-dependent growth rate of primary breast cancer.
Cancer. 1993 Jun 1;71(11):3547-51. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930601)71:11<3547::aid-cncr2820711114>3.0.co;2-c.
2
Interval cancers and sensitivity in the screening centres of the UK trial of early detection of breast cancer.
Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(2):255-8. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90187-k.
3
Mammography screening guidelines for women 40 to 49 and over 65 years old.针对40至49岁以及65岁以上女性的乳腺钼靶筛查指南。
Ann Epidemiol. 1994 Mar;4(2):96-101. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90053-1.
4
Age-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Mar 16;86(6):436-41. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.6.436.
5
Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌筛查国际研讨会报告
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20;85(20):1644-56. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.20.1644.
6
Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials.乳腺钼靶筛查乳腺癌:瑞典随机试验综述。
Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):973-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v.
7
Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: estimation procedures from mass screening programmes.慢性病筛查简化模型:大规模筛查项目的估计程序
Biometrics. 1984 Mar;40(1):1-14.
8
Estimation of the duration of a pre-clinical disease state using screening data.利用筛查数据估算临床前疾病状态的持续时间。
Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Dec;118(6):865-86. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113705.
9
Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study.通过病例对照研究对一项非随机研究(DOM项目)中的乳腺癌筛查进行评估。
Lancet. 1984 Jun 2;1(8388):1224-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91704-5.
10
Estimating the sensitivity of a screening test.估计筛查试验的灵敏度。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985 Dec;39(4):364-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.39.4.364.