Simon J H, Malim M H
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19104-6148, USA.
J Virol. 1996 Aug;70(8):5297-305. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.8.5297-5305.1996.
The vif gene of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is absolutely required for productive infection of primary cells derived from human blood and certain immortalized T lymphoid cells, for example, H9. Cells with this restrictive phenotype are termed nonpermissive, whereas cell lines in which vif-deficient virus can replicate efficiently are known as permissive. In this paper, we describe experiments in which virus stocks derived from single-cycle infections of strictly nonpermissive H9 cells were used to determine the fate of vif-deficient infections. By PCR-based approaches, it was found that Vif has no significant impact on the biosynthetic capability of the virion reverse transcriptase in infected C8166 T cells. Specifically, the initial appearance of all DNA species up to and including initiated second (plus) strands as well as the early accumulation of these replicative intermediates is equivalent for wild-type and vif-deficient infections. However, whereas these viral DNAs are stably maintained in wild-type infections and can proceed to establish proviruses, they are largely degraded by the later time points of vif-deficient infections and, as a result, are prevented from forming proviruses. Subcellular fractionation analyses indicated that the majority of viral DNA is localized to the nucleus within 2 h of infection and that the turnover of reverse transcripts that occurs in these vif-deficient infections presumably takes place in the nucleus. Given that the ultimate infection phenotype of the virions is determined during virus production, we propose that Vif is required for an aspect of virus assembly and/or maturation that endows penetrating viral nucleoprotein cores with the ability to mature into functional preintegration complexes that can proceed to provirus establishment. In contrast, viruses that are produced in the absence of Vif give rise to nucleoprotein complexes that disassemble prematurely in challenged cells and fail to protect their RNA/DNA contents from nucleolytic destruction.
1型人类免疫缺陷病毒的vif基因对于源自人血液的原代细胞和某些永生化T淋巴细胞(例如H9细胞)的有效感染是绝对必需的。具有这种限制表型的细胞被称为非允许细胞,而vif缺陷病毒能够有效复制的细胞系则被称为允许细胞。在本文中,我们描述了一些实验,其中使用源自严格非允许性H9细胞单周期感染的病毒株来确定vif缺陷感染的命运。通过基于PCR的方法,发现在感染的C8166 T细胞中,Vif对病毒粒子逆转录酶的生物合成能力没有显著影响。具体而言,直至并包括起始的第二条(正)链在内的所有DNA种类的初始出现以及这些复制中间体的早期积累,对于野生型和vif缺陷感染而言是等同的。然而,虽然这些病毒DNA在野生型感染中能够稳定维持并可进而建立前病毒,但在vif缺陷感染的后期时间点,它们大多会被降解,因此无法形成前病毒。亚细胞分级分离分析表明,大多数病毒DNA在感染后2小时内定位于细胞核,并且在这些vif缺陷感染中发生的逆转录产物的周转大概发生在细胞核中。鉴于病毒粒子的最终感染表型是在病毒产生过程中确定的,我们提出Vif对于病毒组装和/或成熟的某个方面是必需的,该方面赋予穿透性病毒核蛋白核心成熟为能够进而建立前病毒的功能性预整合复合物的能力。相比之下,在没有Vif的情况下产生的病毒会产生核蛋白复合物,这些复合物在受挑战的细胞中过早解体,并且无法保护其RNA/DNA内容物免受核酸酶破坏。