Overexpression of the herpes simplex virus type 1 immediate-early regulatory protein, ICP27, is responsible for the aberrant localization of ICP0 and mutant forms of ICP4 in ICP4 mutant virus-infected cells.

ICP0 and ICP4 are immediate-early regulatory proteins of herpes simplex virus type 1. Previous studies by Knipe and Smith demonstrated that these two proteins are characteristically observed in the nuclei of wild-type virus-infected cells but predominantly in the cytoplasms of cells infected with several ICP4 temperature-sensitive (ts) mutant viruses at the nonpermissive temperature (NPT) (D. M. Knipe and J. L. Smith, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:2371-2381, 1986). Consistent with this observation, it has been shown previously that ICP0 is present predominantly in the cytoplasms of cells infected with an ICP4 null mutant virus (n12) at high multiplicities of infection and that the level of ICP27, a third viral regulatory protein, plays an important role in determining the intracellular localization of ICP0 (Z. Zhu, W. Cai, and P. A. Schaffer, J. Virol. 68:3027-3040, 1994). To address whether the cytoplasmic localization of ICP0 is a common feature of cells infected with all ICP4 mutant viruses or whether mutant ICP4 polypeptides, together with ICP27, determine the intracellular localization of ICP0, we used double-staining immunofluorescence tests to examine the intracellular staining patterns of ICP0 and ICP4 in cells infected with an extensive series of ICP4 mutant viruses. In these tests, compared with the localization pattern of ICP0 in wild-type virus-infected cells, more ICP0 was detected in the cytoplasms of cells infected with all ICP4 mutants tested at high multiplicities of infection. Each of the mutant forms of ICP4 exhibiting predominantly cytoplasmic staining contains both the nuclear localization signal and the previously mapped ICP27-responsive region (Z. Zhu and P. A. Schaffer, J. Virol. 69:49-59, 1995). No correlation between the intracellular staining patterns of ICP0 and mutant forms of ICP4 was demonstrated, suggesting that mutant ICP4 polypeptides per se are not responsible for retention of ICP0 in the cytoplasm. This observation was confirmed in studies of cells cotransfected with plasmids expressing ICP0 and mutant forms of ICP4, in which the staining pattern of ICP0 was not changed in the presence of mutant ICP4 proteins. Studies of cells infected at low multiplicities with a variety of ICP4 ts mutant viruses at the NPT showed that both ICP0 and ts forms of ICP4 were localized predominantly within the nucleus. These observations are a further indication that the aberrant localization of the ts forms of ICP4 at the NPT is not a direct result of specific mutations in the ICP4 gene. In the final series of tests, the localization of ICP0 in cells infected with a double-mutant virus unable to express either ICP4 or ICP27 was examined. In these tests, ICP0 was detected exclusively in the nuclei of Vero cells but in both the nuclei and the cytoplasms of ICP27-expressing cells infected with the double mutant. These results demonstrate that ICP27, rather than the absence of functional ICP4, is responsible for the cytoplasmic localization of ICP0 in ICP4 mutant virus-infected cells. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the aberrant localization of ICP0 and certain mutant forms of ICP4 in cells infected with ICP4 mutant viruses is mediated by high levels of ICP27 resulting from the inability of mutant forms of ICP4 to repress the expression of ICP27.