• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Linear and angular measurements of the mandible during maximal mouth opening.

作者信息

Muto T, Kanazawa M

机构信息

First Department of Oral Surgery, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, School of Dentistry, Japan.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Aug;54(8):970-4. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90394-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90394-8
PMID:8765386
Abstract

PURPOSE

There are numerous reports of the translatory movement of the condyle in maximal mouth opening; however, the rotatory movement is less well understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rotatory condylar movement and the factors associated with it in normal subjects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To study the role of facial morphology in maximal mouth opening, linear and angular measurements of the mandible in both the closed and maximal open positions were made by means of cephalometry. Dental students, 29 men and 31 women with no functional disorders of the masticatory system, were investigated.

RESULTS

When the mouth was fully opened, the linear measurement of condylar movement was 20.5 +/- 4.0 mm in men and 18.1 +/- 2.5 mm in women, and the angular measurements of the rotation of the mandibular ramus were 39.1 +/- 5.9 degrees in men and 36.3 +/- 4.3 degrees in women. These differences were statistically significant (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

During condylar movement and rotation of the mandible, mandibular length and the inclination of the mandibular ramus in the former, and the inclination of the mandibular ramus, the mandibular angle and the position of the condyle in the latter, were important factors.

摘要

相似文献

1
Linear and angular measurements of the mandible during maximal mouth opening.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Aug;54(8):970-4. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90394-8.
2
The relationship between maximal jaw opening and size of skeleton: a cephalometric study.最大张口度与骨骼大小之间的关系:一项头影测量研究。
J Oral Rehabil. 1996 Jan;23(1):22-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb00807.x.
3
Correlation between facial morphology, mouth opening ability, and condylar movement during opening-closing jaw movements in female adults with normal occlusion.正常咬合成年女性在开闭口颌运动过程中面部形态、开口能力与髁突运动之间的相关性
Eur J Orthod. 2002 Aug;24(4):327-36. doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.4.327.
4
Findings of mandibular movement and the position of the mandibular condyles during maximal mouth opening.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987 May;63(5):517-25. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90219-2.
5
Functions of condylar translation in human mandibular movement.
Am J Orthod. 1985 Sep;88(3):191-202. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9416(85)90214-3.
6
Influence of mandibular length on mouth opening.下颌长度对张口度的影响。
J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Feb;26(2):117-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00358.x.
7
Associations between incisor and mandibular condylar movements during maximum mouth opening in humans.人类最大开口时切牙与下颌髁突运动之间的关联。
Arch Oral Biol. 2000 Apr;45(4):267-75. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(99)00140-5.
8
Local kinematic and anthropometric factors related to the maximum mouth opening in healthy individuals.与健康个体最大张口度相关的局部运动学和人体测量学因素。
J Oral Rehabil. 2002 Jun;29(6):534-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00895.x.
9
Radiographic analysis for jaw motion normalization.用于下颌运动正常化的影像学分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jul;63(7):961-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.011.
10
The position of the mandibular condyle at maximal mouth opening in normal subjects.正常受试者最大张口时下颌髁突的位置。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Dec;52(12):1269-72. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(94)90049-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Technique to Accurately Measure Mouth Opening Using 3D Electromagnetic Articulography.一种使用三维电磁关节造影术精确测量张口度的新技术。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Oct 19;9(10):577. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100577.