• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直觉体验式与分析理性思维方式的个体差异。

Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.

作者信息

Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, Heier H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):390-405. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.390.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.390
PMID:8765488
Abstract

Two studies provide evidence for the reliability and validity of a new self-report measure of individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking based on cognitive-experiential self-theory (CEST). The Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI) was constructed to measure the 2 independent processing modes with a modified Need for Cognition Scale (NFC, J.T. Cacioppo & R.E. Petty, 1982) and a new scale, Faith in Intuition (FI). In Study 1, a factor analysis yielded 2 orthogonal factors corresponding to NFC and FI. Although heuristic processing was determined primarily by FI, NFC also contributed to heuristic responding, in line with CEST. The relation of FI and NFC to coping ability also was examined. In Study 2, the factor structure of the REI was replicated (N = 973). NFC and FI were differentially related to measures of personality, adjustment, achievement, and interpersonal relations.

摘要

两项研究为一种基于认知体验自我理论(CEST)的、用于测量直觉体验式与分析理性思维中个体差异的新的自我报告测量方法的信效度提供了证据。理性体验量表(REI)旨在通过一个经过修改的认知需求量表(NFC,J.T. 卡乔波和R.E. 佩蒂,1982)以及一个新量表——直觉信念(FI)来测量这两种独立的加工模式。在研究1中,一项因素分析得出了两个与NFC和FI相对应的正交因素。尽管启发式加工主要由FI决定,但NFC也对启发式反应有贡献,这与CEST一致。同时还考察了FI和NFC与应对能力的关系。在研究2中,对REI的因素结构进行了重复验证(N = 973)。NFC和FI与人格、适应、成就及人际关系的测量指标存在不同程度的相关。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.直觉体验式与分析理性思维方式的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):390-405. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.390.
2
Relating Rational and Experiential Thinking Styles With Trait Emotional Intelligence in Broader Personality Space.在更广阔的人格空间中将理性与经验性思维方式与特质情绪智力联系起来
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;15(1):140-158. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1692. eCollection 2019 Feb.
3
The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon.理性与经验信息加工方式与人格、基本信念及比率偏差现象的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jun;76(6):972-87. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.972.
4
An experiential thinking style: its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures.经验思维风格:其各个方面及其与客观和主观标准测量的关系。
J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):1043-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00718.x.
5
The Serbian validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory.塞尔维亚版理性情绪行为问卷-40 版和理性情绪多模态问卷的验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0294705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294705. eCollection 2023.
6
Is experiential-intuitive cognitive style more inclined to err on conjunction fallacy than analytical-rational cognitive style?体验-直觉认知风格比分析-理性认知风格更倾向于在合取谬误上犯错吗?
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 6;6:85. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00085. eCollection 2015.
7
Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?认知反思测试是对反思和直觉的一种衡量手段吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):341-8. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1.
8
Individual differences in processing styles: validity of the Rational-Experiential Inventory.加工方式的个体差异:理性-经验量表的效度
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Oct;49(5):439-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00652.x. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
9
Need for cognition as a predictor of psychosocial identity development.认知需求作为心理社会身份发展的预测指标。
J Psychol. 2008 Nov;142(6):645-55. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.6.645-655.
10
Are Individual Differences in Information-Processing Styles Related to Transformational Leadership? A Test of the Cognitive Experiential Leadership Model.信息处理风格的个体差异与变革型领导有关吗?认知体验式领导模型的一项检验。
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 26;12:599008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.599008. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Intolerance of Uncertainty Mediates the Relationship Between Autistic Traits and a Propensity for Deliberation.不确定性不耐受介导了自闭症特质与审慎倾向之间的关系。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06987-6.
2
Hear, See, Do (Nothing)? An Integrative Framework of Co-Workers' Reactions to Interpersonal Workplace Mistreatment.听、看、无所作为?同事对职场人际虐待反应的综合框架
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;15(6):764. doi: 10.3390/bs15060764.
3
The Relationship Between Illusory Health Beliefs, Recommended Health Behaviours, and Complementary and Alternative Medicine: An Investigation Across Multiple Time Points.
虚幻健康信念、推荐健康行为与补充和替代医学之间的关系:跨多个时间点的调查
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 1;15(5):614. doi: 10.3390/bs15050614.
4
Reflection or Dependence: How AI Awareness Affects Employees' In-Role and Extra-Role Performance?反思还是依赖:人工智能意识如何影响员工的角色内和角色外绩效?
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 25;15(2):128. doi: 10.3390/bs15020128.
5
Need for cognition, academic self-efficacy and parental education predict the intention to go to college-evidence from a multigroup study.认知需求、学业自我效能感和父母教育程度预测上大学的意愿——来自多组研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 5;16:1487038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1487038. eCollection 2025.
6
Populist attitudes and belief in conspiracy theories: anti-elitist attitudes and the preference for unrestricted popular sovereignty reduce the positive impact of an analytical thinking style on conspiracy beliefs.民粹主义态度与对阴谋论的信仰:反精英态度以及对不受限制的人民主权的偏好,削弱了分析性思维方式对阴谋论信仰的积极影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Feb 11;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07136-z.
7
The role of cognitive motivation and self-regulation in coping with occupational demands.认知动机和自我调节在应对职业需求中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 4;15:1422724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1422724. eCollection 2024.
8
Intellectually Rigorous but Morally Tolerant: Exploring Moral Leniency as a Mediator Between Cognitive Style and "Utilitarian" Judgment.严谨但道德宽容:探究道德宽容作为认知风格与“功利主义”判断之间的中介因素
Cogn Sci. 2024 Dec;48(12):e70024. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70024.
9
Lifetime prevalence of questionable health behaviors and their psychological roots: A preregistered nationally representative survey.终身不良健康行为的流行率及其心理根源:一项预先注册的全国代表性调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 6;19(11):e0313173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313173. eCollection 2024.
10
Autistic people differ from non-autistic people subjectively, but not objectively in their reasoning.自闭症患者与非自闭症患者在主观上存在差异,但在推理方面并无客观差异。
Autism. 2025 Feb;29(2):355-366. doi: 10.1177/13623613241277055. Epub 2024 Oct 10.