• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听、看、无所作为?同事对职场人际虐待反应的综合框架

Hear, See, Do (Nothing)? An Integrative Framework of Co-Workers' Reactions to Interpersonal Workplace Mistreatment.

作者信息

Bastiaensen Caroline Veronique Marijke, Baillien Elfi, Brebels Lieven

机构信息

Work and Organisation Studies, KU Leuven, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;15(6):764. doi: 10.3390/bs15060764.

DOI:10.3390/bs15060764
PMID:40564546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12189629/
Abstract

Interpersonal workplace mistreatment (IWM) is a pervasive issue with varied co-worker reactions. Despite significant growth in IWM research, understanding co-workers' responses remains challenging due to scattered research streams and a focus on isolated components. Therefore, this integrative review synthesizes the existing literature to examine when and how co-workers respond to IWM. We identify key factors influencing both the intention and actual behavior of co-workers when initially witnessing IWM. These factors are categorized into eight overarching individual (perceived responsibility, emotion and affect, personal characteristics) and contextual themes (social relationships, risks and costs considerations, workplace characteristics, target characteristics, characteristics of the perpetrator and the act of IWM). By integrating these factors into a comprehensive framework drawing on dual processing accounts, we highlight the complex interplay between cognitive and affective processes in shaping co-worker responses. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for designing effective intervention programs that encourage co-workers to counteract IWM. Our findings offer valuable theoretical insights and practical implications for fostering a more supportive and just workplace environment.

摘要

职场人际虐待(IWM)是一个普遍存在的问题,同事会有各种各样的反应。尽管IWM研究有了显著增长,但由于研究方向分散且专注于孤立的组成部分,理解同事的反应仍然具有挑战性。因此,本综合综述整合现有文献,以研究同事在何时以及如何应对IWM。我们确定了同事最初目睹IWM时影响其意图和实际行为的关键因素。这些因素分为八个总体个人(感知责任、情绪和情感、个人特征)和情境主题(社会关系、风险和成本考量、职场特征、目标特征、施虐者特征以及IWM行为)。通过将这些因素整合到一个基于双重加工理论的综合框架中,我们强调了认知和情感过程在塑造同事反应中的复杂相互作用。理解这些动态对于设计有效的干预计划以鼓励同事抵制IWM至关重要。我们的研究结果为营造更具支持性和公正性的职场环境提供了有价值的理论见解和实际意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd31/12189629/89b6b7031bed/behavsci-15-00764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd31/12189629/89b6b7031bed/behavsci-15-00764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd31/12189629/89b6b7031bed/behavsci-15-00764-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Hear, See, Do (Nothing)? An Integrative Framework of Co-Workers' Reactions to Interpersonal Workplace Mistreatment.听、看、无所作为?同事对职场人际虐待反应的综合框架
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;15(6):764. doi: 10.3390/bs15060764.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
4
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.工作场所干预措施以降低医疗机构外 SARS-CoV-2 感染的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD015112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015112.pub2.
6
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
7
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
8
"We're all in it together": uniting a diverse range of professionals and people with lived experience within the development of a complex, theory-based paediatric speech and language therapy intervention.“我们同舟共济”:在一项基于理论的复杂儿科言语和语言治疗干预措施的开发过程中,团结各类专业人员以及有实际经验的人士。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00738-8.
9
Behavioural interventions to promote workers' use of respiratory protective equipment.促进工人使用呼吸防护设备的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 7;12(12):CD010157. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010157.pub2.
10
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A spectrum of bystander actions: Latent profile analysis of sexual harassment intervention behavior at work.一系列旁观者行为:工作中性骚扰干预行为的潜在类别分析
J Appl Psychol. 2025 Sep;110(9):1198-1224. doi: 10.1037/apl0001280. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
What happens after anti-Asian racism at work? A moral exclusion perspective on coworker confrontation and mechanisms.工作场所的反亚裔种族主义事件发生后会怎样?关于同事对抗和机制的道德排斥视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2025 Mar;110(3):432-443. doi: 10.1037/apl0001242. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
How Identity Impacts Bystander Responses to Workplace Mistreatment.
身份认同如何影响旁观者对职场虐待行为的反应。
J Manage. 2024 Sep;50(7):2641-2674. doi: 10.1177/01492063231177976. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
4
Who speaks up when harassment is in the air? A within-person investigation of ambient harassment and voice behavior at work.当骚扰弥漫时,谁会站出来说话?工作环境骚扰和声音行为的个体内研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2024 Jan;109(1):39-60. doi: 10.1037/apl0001131. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
5
Multilevel causal attributions on transboundary risk: Effects on attributions of responsibility, psychological distance, and policy support.跨国风险的多层次因果归因:对归因于责任、心理距离和政策支持的影响。
Risk Anal. 2023 Jul;43(7):1310-1328. doi: 10.1111/risa.14000. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
6
Does Bystander Intervention Training Work? When Employee Intentions and Organisational Barriers Collide.旁观者干预培训是否有效?当员工的意图和组织的障碍发生冲突时。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Feb;38(3-4):2934-2956. doi: 10.1177/08862605221104530. Epub 2022 May 23.
7
Factors influencing the behavior of bystanders to workplace bullying in healthcare-A qualitative descriptive interview study.影响医疗保健行业工作场所欺凌旁观者行为的因素:定性描述性访谈研究。
Res Nurs Health. 2022 Aug;45(4):424-432. doi: 10.1002/nur.22228. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
8
A Systematic Review of Negative Work Behavior: Toward an Integrated Definition.消极工作行为的系统综述:迈向综合定义
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:726973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726973. eCollection 2021.
9
Observer reactions to workplace mistreatment: It's a matter of perspective.观察者对工作场所虐待的反应:这是一个视角问题。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2021 Oct;26(5):374-392. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000205. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
Bystander Reactions to Workplace Incivility: The Role of Gender and Discrimination Claims.旁观者对职场不文明行为的反应:性别与歧视指控的作用。
Eur J Psychol. 2021 Feb 26;17(1):134-144. doi: 10.5964/ejop.1675. eCollection 2021 Feb.