Suppr超能文献

经验思维风格:其各个方面及其与客观和主观标准测量的关系。

An experiential thinking style: its facets and relations with objective and subjective criterion measures.

机构信息

Pacific University.

出版信息

J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):1043-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00718.x.

Abstract

In Study 1, an experiential factor divided into the following 3 factors when 3 or more factors were extracted: intuition, emotionality, and imagination; whereas a rational factor retained its coherence. In Study 2, an experiential but not a rational thinking style was positively associated with performance measures of creativity, humor, aesthetic judgment, and intuition and with self-report measures of empathy and social popularity. A rational thinking style was associated with several measures of adjustment. Both thinking styles were positively related to personal growth. Support was provided from several sources for the discriminant validity of the experiential facets. In a third study, the independence of the 2 thinking styles and of gender differences in self-reported data were verified by observations by others of participants' thinking styles. The importance of identifying facets of an experiential thinking style and of discovering previously unrecognized favorable attributes of this thinking style was discussed.

摘要

在研究 1 中,当提取 3 个或更多因素时,经验因素分为以下 3 个因素:直觉、情感和想象力;而理性因素保持其连贯性。在研究 2 中,经验思维方式而不是理性思维方式与创造力、幽默、审美判断和直觉的绩效衡量指标以及同理心和社交受欢迎程度的自我报告衡量指标呈正相关。理性思维方式与几个调整措施有关。两种思维方式都与个人成长呈正相关。经验方面的区别效度得到了多个来源的支持。在第三项研究中,通过观察参与者的思维方式,其他人对两种思维方式的独立性以及自我报告数据中的性别差异进行了验证。讨论了识别经验思维方式的各个方面以及发现这种思维方式以前未被认识到的有利属性的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验