Suppr超能文献

关于止血带疼痛试验的敏感性。

On the sensitivity of the tourniquet pain test.

作者信息

Sternbach Richard A, Deems Lydia M, Timmermans Gretchen, Huey Leighton Y

机构信息

Pain Unit, Veterans Administration Hospital, San Diego, Calif. 92161, U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain. 1977 Apr;3(2):105-110. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(77)90073-2.

Abstract

Twenty-four chronic pain patients were given, on each of 4 successive days, oral doses of 60 mg morphine, 60 mg codeine, 600 mg aspirin and placebo, using a double-blind counterbalanced design. Two hours after ingestion, subjective pain estimates and tourniquet pain scores were obtained. Variability of the tourniquet pain scores was too great for differences in response to the analgesics to be significant. However, differences in pain estimates were also too small to discriminate among the drugs, and the lack of sensitivity may be a function of pain chronicity. The tourniquet techniques will continue to be useful until there is a purely objective measure of the severity of clinical pain.

摘要

采用双盲平衡设计,24名慢性疼痛患者在连续4天中的每一天都口服60毫克吗啡、60毫克可待因、600毫克阿司匹林和安慰剂。服药两小时后,获得主观疼痛评估和止血带疼痛评分。止血带疼痛评分的变异性太大,以至于无法得出镇痛药反应差异具有显著性的结论。然而,疼痛评估的差异也太小,无法区分不同药物,而缺乏敏感性可能是疼痛慢性化的一个作用。在出现临床疼痛严重程度的纯客观测量方法之前,止血带技术仍将有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验