• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[胆囊穿刺引流术治疗急性胆囊炎]

[Gallbladder puncture and drainage as therapy of acute cholecystitis].

作者信息

Braun B, Blank W

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik, Kreiskrankenhaus Reutlingen.

出版信息

Med Klin (Munich). 1996 Jun 15;91(6):359-65.

PMID:8767309
Abstract

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An ultrasound-guided, percutaneous puncture (n = 30) and cholecystostomy (n = 10) was performed on 40 high-risk patients aged between 38 and 99 (mean age 78 years old) suffering from acute lithogenic cholecystitis or acalculous stress cholecystitis on account of general inoperability. Two catheter dislocations and in 3 cases a slight bile leakage were observed as complications.

RESULTS

The puncture and drainage led to a dramatic alleviation of pain for all patients, the involution of a paralytic subileus and improvement of the general condition. Eighteen patients underwent a laparoscopic or open interval cholecystectomy in a stabilised condition. There was no recurrence of inflammation in 22 patients over a follow-up period of up to 5 years, so that one can assume a cicatrised healing of the acute choleycstitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided, percutaneous puncture and cholecystostomy are effective, low-risk, and only slightly invasive procedures which can be employed for risk patients with acute cholecystitis as a life-saving, and in some cases definitive treatment. On account of pathogenic considerations, they should be included in the diagnostic and therapeutic concept at an early stage, particularly for acute, acalculous stress cholecystitis.

摘要

患者与方法

对40例年龄在38至99岁(平均年龄78岁)之间、因全身情况不宜手术而患有急性结石性胆囊炎或非结石性应激性胆囊炎的高危患者进行了超声引导下经皮穿刺(n = 30)和胆囊造瘘术(n = 10)。观察到2例导管移位和3例轻微胆漏作为并发症。

结果

穿刺引流使所有患者的疼痛显著减轻,麻痹性小肠梗阻消退,全身状况改善。18例患者在病情稳定后接受了腹腔镜或开放择期胆囊切除术。在长达5年的随访期内,22例患者无炎症复发,因此可以认为急性胆囊炎已瘢痕愈合。

结论

超声引导下经皮穿刺和胆囊造瘘术是有效、低风险且微创的手术,可用于急性胆囊炎高危患者,作为挽救生命的治疗方法,在某些情况下也是确定性治疗。出于病因学考虑,它们应尽早纳入诊断和治疗方案,特别是对于急性非结石性应激性胆囊炎。

相似文献

1
[Gallbladder puncture and drainage as therapy of acute cholecystitis].[胆囊穿刺引流术治疗急性胆囊炎]
Med Klin (Munich). 1996 Jun 15;91(6):359-65.
2
[Percutaneous gallbladder drainage a good treatment in patients with acute cholecystitis and and poor clinical status].经皮胆囊引流术是急性胆囊炎且临床状况较差患者的一种良好治疗方法
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 Sep 25;137(39):1965-8.
3
Palliative percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage of gallbladder empyema before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.在腹腔镜胆囊切除术之前对胆囊积脓进行姑息性经皮经肝胆囊引流术。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 Jul-Aug;47(34):932-6.
4
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: one center's experience.超声引导下经皮胆囊造瘘术治疗危重症患者急性胆囊炎:单中心经验
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2005 Sep;16(3):134-7.
5
The role of percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy in the management of acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients.
Int Surg. 1995 Apr-Jun;80(2):111-4.
6
Percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of acute cholecystitis.经皮胆囊造瘘术在急性胆囊炎治疗中的应用
Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Mar;5(3):170-1.
7
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculous and acalculous cholecystitis.经皮胆囊造瘘术用于急性结石性和非结石性胆囊炎的诊断与治疗。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1995 Jul-Aug;6(4):629-34. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(95)71150-2.
8
Percutaneous cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis and an increased surgical risk.经皮胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎且手术风险增加的患者。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1996 Mar-Apr;19(2):72-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02563896.
9
Percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy.经皮经肝胆囊造瘘术
Rofo. 1985 Jan;142(1):80-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1052604.
10
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis.超声引导下经皮经肝胆囊造瘘术治疗急性无结石性胆囊炎
Arch Surg. 1985 Dec;120(12):1354-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390360020005.