Suppr超能文献

[Computerized multiple-choice questions: an efficacious method of evaluation in medical instruction?].

作者信息

Sandroni C, Bocci M G, Damiani F, Barelli A, Proietti R, Magalini S I

机构信息

Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma.

出版信息

Recenti Prog Med. 1996 May;87(5):218-22.

PMID:8767758
Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) as an evaluation tool in medical education, were analyzed the responses to 80 MCQ delivered by 300 physicians working in emergency departments and following a course on Basic and Advanced Life Support. Pre- and post-test were administered using a dedicated computer application running on PC. Students' scores were high and demonstrated both course and test validity. More than 95% of the students used the computer application without interface difficulties. However, some limits of MCQ were individuated: first, misinterpretation of some questions, especially when two or more similar answers were presented; from the other side, the student's personal experiences during the course practice could influence student's responses bringing him to different conclusions on respect to the instructor. These difficulties should be kept in mind in the development of a MCQ session, and students should have the possibility to give to the instructor a feedback of problems encountered during the course. This is especially important when MCQ are the sole evaluation technique.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验