• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腔引流管与传统肋间置管引流治疗气胸的比较

The management of pneumothorax with the thoracic vent versus conventional intercostal tube drainage.

作者信息

Röggla M, Wagner A, Brunner C, Röggla G

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Vienna.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1996;108(11):330-3.

PMID:8767986
Abstract

The thoracic vent is a new minimally invasive device for the treatment of spontaneous and iatrogenic pneumothorax. It consists of a polyurethane catheter connected to a plastic chamber containing a one-way valve. As there is no need to connect the thoracic vent to an underwater seal device, immobilization and hospitalization can be avoided. So far the performance of the thoracic vent has been evaluated only in patients without pleural effusions and without signs of tension pneumothorax. Hence, we have performed a randomized study comparing the treatment of pneumothorax by means of the thoracic vent versus conventional intercostal tube drainage in 30 patients, including some with tension pneumothorax. 17 patients were treated with the thoracic vent, 13 with conventional intercostal tube drainage. We found no significant differences in the rate of reexpansion and rate of complications between the group treated with the thoracic vent and the group treated with intercostal tube drainage, but the patients treated with the thoracic vent needed significantly less analgesics. 70% of the patients treated with the thoracic vent were successfully managed on an outpatient basis. All patients treated with intercostal tube drainage were hospitalised; duration of inpatient-therapy was 8 +/- 6.2 days (mean +/- SD).

摘要

胸腔通气装置是一种用于治疗自发性和医源性气胸的新型微创设备。它由一根聚氨酯导管连接到一个装有单向阀的塑料腔室组成。由于无需将胸腔通气装置连接到水封装置,因此可以避免固定和住院。到目前为止,胸腔通气装置的性能仅在没有胸腔积液且没有张力性气胸迹象的患者中进行了评估。因此,我们进行了一项随机研究,比较了30例患者(包括一些张力性气胸患者)使用胸腔通气装置与传统肋间导管引流治疗气胸的效果。17例患者接受胸腔通气装置治疗,13例接受传统肋间导管引流治疗。我们发现,胸腔通气装置治疗组和肋间导管引流治疗组在肺复张率和并发症发生率方面没有显著差异,但使用胸腔通气装置治疗的患者所需的镇痛药明显较少。70%接受胸腔通气装置治疗的患者在门诊成功治愈。所有接受肋间导管引流治疗的患者均住院治疗;住院治疗时间为8±6.2天(平均值±标准差)。

相似文献

1
The management of pneumothorax with the thoracic vent versus conventional intercostal tube drainage.胸腔引流管与传统肋间置管引流治疗气胸的比较
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1996;108(11):330-3.
2
Use of the Heimlich valve for treating pneumothorax.使用海姆利克阀治疗气胸。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1999;88(1):36-7.
3
Outpatient Treatment of Pneumothorax with a Thoracic Vent: Economic Benefit.使用胸腔引流管进行气胸的门诊治疗:经济效益
Respiration. 2015;90(1):33-9. doi: 10.1159/000381958. Epub 2015 May 12.
4
[Iatrogenic pneumothorax treated with a small calibre pleural tube].[小口径胸腔引流管治疗医源性气胸]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Apr 1;153(14):978-80.
5
[Application of heimlich valve drainage to interventional procedure-induced pneumothorax in cancer patients: a report of thirteen cases].[海姆利希瓣膜引流在癌症患者介入治疗所致气胸中的应用:附13例报告]
Ai Zheng. 2005 Jun;24(6):718-21.
6
Intercostal tube drainage of pleura: urosac as chest drainage bag.胸膜肋间置管引流:使用尿袋作为胸腔引流袋。
J Assoc Physicians India. 1996 Jun;44(6):381-2.
7
Preliminary report of a prospective, randomized trial of underwater seal for spontaneous and iatrogenic pneumothorax.自发性和医源性气胸水下密封的前瞻性随机试验初步报告
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jan;204(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.012. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
8
Outpatient management of postbiopsy pneumothorax with small-caliber chest tubes: factors affecting the need for prolonged drainage and additional interventions.小口径胸管用于活检后气胸的门诊管理:影响长期引流需求及额外干预措施的因素
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 Mar-Apr;31(2):342-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9250-z. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
9
Spontaneous pneumothorax: outpatient management with intercostal tube drainage.自发性气胸:肋间置管引流的门诊管理
Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Mar 22;112(6):707-9.
10
Outpatient treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax using an improved pocket sized Heimlich valve.使用改良的袖珍型海姆利克阀对自发性气胸进行门诊治疗。
Med J Malaysia. 2003 Oct;58(4):597-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in the Emergency Department: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.急诊科原发性自发性气胸的管理:一项成本效益分析。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Jul 2;6(4):100209. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100209. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients.稳定患者中使用小针头手动抽吸治疗大量气胸的有效性及失败因素
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Feb;14(2):321-332. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1587.
3
Management of the Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Current Guidance, Controversies, and Recent Advances.
继发性自发性气胸的管理:当前指南、争议及最新进展
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 22;11(5):1173. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051173.
4
Systematic review and meta-analysis of initial management of pneumothorax in adults: Intercostal tube drainage versus other invasive methods.成人气胸初始治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析:肋间置管引流与其他侵入性方法的比较
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 22;12(6):e0178802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178802. eCollection 2017.
5
Effectiveness of Ambulatory Tru-Close Thoracic Vent for the Outpatient Management of Pneumothorax: A Prospective Pilot Study.门诊用Tru-Close胸腔引流装置治疗气胸的有效性:一项前瞻性初步研究
Korean J Radiol. 2017 May-Jun;18(3):519-525. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.3.519. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
6
Spontaneous pneumothorax.自发性气胸
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Jan 17;2011:1505.
7
Spontaneous pneumothorax.自发性气胸
BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Mar 10;2008:1505.
8
[Pneumothorax].[气胸]
Internist (Berl). 2004 May;45(5):549-54. doi: 10.1007/s00108-004-1167-x.