Suppr超能文献

稳定患者中使用小针头手动抽吸治疗大量气胸的有效性及失败因素

Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients.

作者信息

Homma Takahiro, Ojima Toshihiro, Shimada Yoshifumi, Tanabe Keitaro, Yamamoto Yutaka, Akemoto Yushi, Kitamura Naoya

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Joetsu General Hospital, Niigata, Japan.

Department of General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2022 Feb;14(2):321-332. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1587.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Manual aspiration as the initial management of a large pneumothorax in a clinically stable patient has been reported to be safe and effective. However, the effect with smaller needles, the number of aspiration, the indication other than spontaneous pneumothorax and failure factors are unknown. We assessed the effectiveness and failure risk factors of manual aspiration up to three using a 20- or 22-gauge (G) needle in patients with a large, clinically stable pneumothorax.

METHODS

We included 107 clinically stable patients with large pneumothorax. Patients who were unstable, required a ventilator, underwent chest tube drainage or had an observed small pneumothorax, bilateral pneumothorax, hemopneumothorax, or postoperative pneumothorax were excluded. Up to three aspirations were performed using 20- or 22-G intravenous needles. When the aspiration volume was ≥2,500 mL or lung expansion did not occur, a chest tube was placed.

RESULTS

The first aspiration was successful in 57 patients (53.3%), the second in 16 patients (59.3%), and the third in eight patients (80.0%). No patient experienced any obvious complications or required emergent hospitalization or surgery after aspiration. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum [odds ratio (OR): 4.93; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-22.71; P=0.0075], spontaneous secondary pneumothorax (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.14-8.76; P=0.027), and ≤24 h from onset to presentation (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.12-8.26; P=0.028). There were no significant differences in intrathoracic pressure after aspiration or plasma factor XIII levels between patients with resolved and persistent pneumothorax.

CONCLUSIONS

Manual aspiration up to three times using a small needle might be one of a treatment option in clinically stable patients with any large pneumothorax. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum, spontaneous secondary pneumothorax, and ≤24 h from onset to presentation.

摘要

背景

据报道,对于临床状况稳定的大量气胸患者,采用手动抽气作为初始治疗方法是安全有效的。然而,较小针头的效果、抽气次数、除自发性气胸以外的适应症以及失败因素尚不清楚。我们评估了在临床状况稳定的大量气胸患者中,使用20号或22号(G)针头进行多达三次手动抽气的有效性和失败风险因素。

方法

我们纳入了107例临床状况稳定的大量气胸患者。排除了不稳定、需要呼吸机支持、接受胸腔闭式引流或观察到有小气胸、双侧气胸、血气胸或术后气胸的患者。使用20G或22G静脉针头进行多达三次抽气。当抽气量≥2500 mL或肺未复张时,放置胸腔闭式引流管。

结果

首次抽气成功57例(53.3%),第二次成功16例(59.3%),第三次成功8例(80.0%)。抽气后无患者出现任何明显并发症,也无需紧急住院或手术。抽气失败与肺门水平胸膜间距>20 mm相关[比值比(OR):4.93;95%置信区间(CI):1.49 - 22.71;P = 0.0075]、自发性继发性气胸(OR:3.11;95% CI:1.14 - 8.76;P = 0.027)以及发病至就诊时间≤24小时(OR:2.95;95% CI:1.12 - 8.26;P = 0.028)。气胸缓解和持续的患者抽气后胸腔内压力或血浆因子XIII水平无显著差异。

结论

对于临床状况稳定的任何大量气胸患者,使用小针头进行多达三次的手动抽气可能是一种治疗选择。抽气失败与肺门水平胸膜间距>20 mm、自发性继发性气胸以及发病至就诊时间≤24小时相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f45/8902101/d3a15bb32472/jtd-14-02-321-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验