Ohishi F, Hayasaki K, Honda T
Cardiovascular Center, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Japan.
J Cardiol. 1996 Jul;28(1):27-32.
Rupture of the left ventricular free wall is one of the most serious sequels of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and results in hospital death. The effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy for AMI to prevent rupture of the left ventricular free wall was studied retrospectively in 31 patients (2.6%) among 1,210 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital within 48 hours after the onset of AMI. All patients were divided into three groups: 758 without reperfusion therapy (conventional group), 113 who underwent direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (direct PTCA group), and 339 who received thrombolytic therapy with or without PTCA (thrombolysis group). No rupture was found in the direct PTCA group. No significant difference could be found in the incidence of the rupture between the conventional group (19 patients, 2.5%) and the thrombolysis group (12 patients, 3.5%). When early rupture and late rupture are defined as occurring less and more than 48 hours from the onset of AMI, 14 early ruptures (1.8%) and 5 late ruptures (0.7%) were found in the conventional group, and 9 early ones (2.7%) and 3 late ones (0.9%) in the thrombolysis group. There was no significant statistical difference between the two groups. The incidence of the rupture according to the result of the reperfusion therapy was much higher in the unsuccessful group (five patients, 7.8%; p < 0.02) than in the successful group (seven patients, 2.5%; p < 0.002). All ruptures in the successful group appeared early; but only two early rupture cases (3.1%) out of five were found in the unsuccessful group. The mean interval between the thrombolysis and the rupture was 3.9 +/- 1.2 hours in the successful group, which was much shorter than that of the unsuccessful group (67.1 +/- 28.5 hours; p < 0.05). We conclude that thrombolytic therapy, if successful, may be effective to decrease late rupture of the left ventricular free wall, but may be ineffective to prevent early rupture.
左心室游离壁破裂是急性心肌梗死(AMI)最严重的并发症之一,可导致患者在医院死亡。我们对我院1210例AMI发病48小时内连续入院的患者中的31例(2.6%)进行回顾性研究,以探讨AMI溶栓治疗预防左心室游离壁破裂的有效性。所有患者分为三组:758例未接受再灌注治疗(常规组),113例行直接经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(直接PTCA组),339例接受溶栓治疗(无论是否行PTCA)(溶栓组)。直接PTCA组未发现破裂病例。常规组(19例,2.5%)和溶栓组(12例,3.5%)的破裂发生率无显著差异。若将AMI发病48小时内及48小时后发生的破裂分别定义为早期破裂和晚期破裂,则常规组有14例早期破裂(1.8%)和5例晚期破裂(0.7%),溶栓组有9例早期破裂(2.7%)和3例晚期破裂(0.9%)。两组间无显著统计学差异。再灌注治疗未成功组的破裂发生率(5例,7.8%;p<0.02)远高于成功组(7例,2.5%;p<0.002)。成功组所有破裂均为早期破裂;但未成功组的5例中仅2例早期破裂(3.1%)。成功组溶栓至破裂的平均间隔时间为3.9±1.2小时,远短于未成功组(67.1±28.5小时;p<0.05)。我们得出结论,溶栓治疗若成功,可能对减少左心室游离壁晚期破裂有效,但对预防早期破裂可能无效。