Allaart C P, Westerhof N
Laboratory for Physiology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Am J Physiol. 1996 Aug;271(2 Pt 2):H447-54. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.2.H447.
We studied the impeding effect of cardiac muscle contraction on coronary arterial inflow in six isolated, perfused papillary muscles of the rat. Special attention was given to the effect of changes in muscle length and contractility on flow impediment in systole. Contractility was changed by resumption of pacing after a quiescent period of 60-100 s or by doubling the calcium concentration in the perfusate and the superfusion fluid from 1 to 2 mM. The vascular bed was maximally dilated with adenosine, and perfusion pressure was kept constant at 69 +/- 3 cmH2O. We found that contractions impede arterial inflow by 29% [from 17.3 +/- 2.2 ml.min-1.g-1 during diastole to 12.4 +/- 1.8 (SE) ml.min-1.g-1 at peak systole, P < 0.001] while the muscle was kept at 90% of maximum muscle length (MLmax). When the muscle was stretched from 80 to 97% of MLmax, diastolic force increased from 0.5 +/- 0.3 to 11.1 +/- 1.2 mN/mm2, systolic force increased from 11.1 +/- 1.5 to 44.6 +/- 4.0 mN/mm2, diastolic flow decreased by 12% (from 18.2 +/- 2.3 to 15.9 +/- 1.9 ml.min-1.g-1, P < 0.05), and systolic flow decreased by 3% (12.4 +/- 2.3 to 12.0 +/- 1.6 ml.min-1.g-1, P = NS). Increased contractility by elevated [Ca2+] did not affect diastolic flow but increased systolic flow impediment from 29 to 39% (systolic flow decreased from 12.4 +/- 1.8 to 10.3 +/- 1.4 ml.min-1.g-1, P < 0.01). The results are qualitatively similar to findings in the intact heart. Limitations on quantitative comparison due to differences in muscle architecture and differences in force vectors in the papillary muscle and the left ventricle are discussed. The results show that ventricular pressure is not essential in systolic coronary arterial flow impediment. The findings are in agreement with the varying elastance concept where the flow impediment is predicted to depend on myocardial elastic properties.
我们研究了大鼠6个离体灌注乳头肌中心肌收缩对冠状动脉血流的阻碍作用。特别关注了肌肉长度和收缩性变化对收缩期血流阻碍的影响。通过在60 - 100秒的静止期后恢复起搏,或通过将灌注液和超灌注液中的钙浓度从1 mM加倍至2 mM来改变收缩性。用腺苷使血管床最大程度扩张,灌注压力保持恒定在69±3 cmH₂O。我们发现,当肌肉保持在最大肌肉长度(MLmax)的90%时,收缩会使动脉血流减少29%[从舒张期的17.3±2.2 ml·min⁻¹·g⁻¹降至收缩期峰值时的12.4±1.8(SE)ml·min⁻¹·g⁻¹,P < 0.001]。当肌肉从MLmax的80%拉伸至97%时,舒张期张力从0.5±0.3增加至11.1±1.2 mN/mm²,收缩期张力从11.1±1.5增加至44.6±4.0 mN/mm²,舒张期血流减少12%(从18.2±2.3降至15.9±1.9 ml·min⁻¹·g⁻¹,P < 0.05),收缩期血流减少3%(从12.4±2.3降至12.0±1.6 ml·min⁻¹·g⁻¹,P = 无统计学意义)。升高[Ca²⁺]增加收缩性并不影响舒张期血流,但使收缩期血流阻碍从29%增加至39%(收缩期血流从12.4±1.8降至10.3±1.4 ml·min⁻¹·g⁻¹,P < 0.01)。这些结果在定性上与完整心脏中的发现相似。讨论了由于肌肉结构差异以及乳头肌和左心室中力向量差异导致的定量比较局限性。结果表明,心室压力在收缩期冠状动脉血流阻碍中并非必不可少。这些发现与变化弹性概念一致,在该概念中,血流阻碍预计取决于心肌弹性特性。